Literature DB >> 3361220

Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: a possible explanation for continence improvement.

G Brodén1, A Dolk, B Holmström.   

Abstract

Twenty-one patients suffering from rectal prolapse (n = 15) or internal rectal procidentia (n = 6) were investigated clinically and by anorectal manometry prior to and six months following retopexy. Rectal prolapse was associated with incontinence in 67% (10/15) of the patients preoperatively. The moderately or severely incontinent patients had lower than normal maximum anal resting pressures (MAP) and those with severe incontinence also had lower than normal maximum squeeze pressure (MSP). Postoperatively only 20% (3/15) of the patients remained incontinent and none of them suffered severe incontinence. MAP values increased significantly indicating that improvement of the function of the internal anal sphincter may be one of the factors contributing to better continence. Rectal sensibility was impaired in patients with rectal prolapse as compared to 15 controls. There was no postoperative change. Patients with internal rectal procidentia had normal MAP and MSP and no postoperative change could be demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3361220     DOI: 10.1007/bf01649678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  20 in total

1.  Symposium: Procidentia of the rectum: results of abdominal rectopexy in the elderly.

Authors:  N F Kirkman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  CONTRIBUTION OF THE EXTERNAL ANAL SPHINCTER TO THE PRESSURE ZONE IN THE ANAL CANAL.

Authors:  H L DUTHIE; J M WATTS
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1965-02       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  A classification of fistula-in-ano.

Authors:  A G Parks; P H Gordon; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Results of the Ripstein operation in the treatment of rectal prolapse and internal rectal procidentia.

Authors:  B Holmström; G Brodén; A Dolk
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  The innervation of the muscles of continence.

Authors:  S J Snooks; M Swash
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Anal manometric findings in patients with anal incontinence.

Authors:  K M Hiltunen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency.

Authors:  M Read; N W Read; D C Barber; H L Duthie
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  M R Keighley; J W Fielding; J Alexander-Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence.

Authors:  D M Matheson; M R Keighley
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Rectal anatomy following Ripstein's operation for prolapse studied by cineradiography.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck; B Brodén; G Brodén; S Ewerth; B Holmström
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1979 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  12 in total

1.  [Anterior and posterior rectopexy with levator repair in patients with rectal prolapse and incontinence].

Authors:  S Athanasiadis; J Heiligers; D Kossivakis
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1992

2.  Paradoxical sphincter reaction and associated colorectal disorders.

Authors:  C Johansson; B Y Nilsson; A Mellgren; A Dolk; B Holmström
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  David P O'Brien
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

Review 4.  Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Medical Management of Rectal Prolapse.

Authors:  Jamie A Cannon
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-02

5.  Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  T T Zittel; K Manncke; S Haug; J F Schäfer; M E Kreis; H D Becker; E C Jehle
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Improvement of continence after abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  K M Hiltunen; M Matikainen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  [Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy using different fixation principles].

Authors:  G Winde; B Reers; A Holzgreve; R Fischer; A Bohlmann; H Bünte
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1993

8.  [Value of abdominal rectopexy in obstructive disorders of defecation. A prospective study using a defecation index, manometry and radiology].

Authors:  S Athanasiadis; J Heiligers
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1993

9.  Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  P Luukkonen; U Mikkonen; H Järvinen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Fecal incontinence: indications for repairing the anal sphincter.

Authors:  F Penninckx
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.