Chelsea M Blankenship1,2, Lisa L Hunter, Douglas H Keefe3, M Patrick Feeney4,5, David K Brown1,2,6, Annie McCune2, Denis F Fitzpatrick3, Li Lin7. 1. Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 2. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 3. Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA. 4. National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA. 5. Department of Otolaryngology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. 6. School of Audiology, Pacific University, Hillsboro, Oregon, USA. 7. Research in Patient Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level and signal to noise ratio in a group of infants from birth to 4 months of age to optimize prediction of hearing status. DPOAEs from infants with normal hearing (NH) and hearing loss (HL) were used to predict the presence of conductive HL (CHL), sensorineural HL (SNHL), and mixed HL (MHL). Wideband ambient absorbance was also measured and compared among the HL types. DESIGN: This is a prospective, longitudinal study of 279 infants with verified NH and HL, including conductive, sensorineural, and mixed types that were enrolled from a well-baby nursery and two neonatal intensive care units in Cincinnati, Ohio. At approximately 1 month of age, DPOAEs (1-8 kHz), wideband absorbance (0.25-8 kHz), and air and bone conduction diagnostic tone burst auditory brainstem response (0.5-4 kHz) thresholds were measured. Hearing status was verified at approximately 9 months of age with visual reinforcement audiometry (0.5-4 kHz). Auditory brainstem response air conduction thresholds were used to assign infants to an NH or HL group, and the efficacy of DPOAE data to classify ears as NH or HL was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Two summary statistics of the ROC curve were calculated: the area under the ROC curve and the point of symmetry on the curve at which the sensitivity and specificity were equal. DPOAE level and signal to noise ratio cutoff values were defined at each frequency as the symmetry point on their respective ROC curve, and DPOAE results were combined across frequency in a multifrequency analysis to predict the presence of HL. RESULTS: Single-frequency test performance of DPOAEs was best at mid to high frequencies (3-8 kHz) with intermediate performance at 1.5 and 2 kHz and chance performance at 1 kHz. Infants with a conductive component to their HL (CHL and MHL combined) displayed significantly lower ambient absorbance values than the NH group. No differences in ambient absorbance were found between the NH and SNHL groups. Multifrequency analysis resulted in the best prediction of HL for the SNHL/MHL group with poorer sensitivity values when infants with CHL were included. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical interpretation of DPOAEs in infants can be improved by using age-appropriate normative ranges and optimized cutoff values. DPOAE interpretation is most predictive at higher F2 test frequencies in young infants (2-8 kHz) due to poor test performance at 1 to 1.5 kHz. Multifrequency rules can be used to improve sensitivity while balancing specificity. Last, a sensitive middle ear measure such as wideband absorbance should be included in the test battery to assess possibility of a conductive component to the HL.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level and signal to noise ratio in a group of infants from birth to 4 months of age to optimize prediction of hearing status. DPOAEs from infants with normal hearing (NH) and hearing loss (HL) were used to predict the presence of conductive HL (CHL), sensorineural HL (SNHL), and mixed HL (MHL). Wideband ambient absorbance was also measured and compared among the HL types. DESIGN: This is a prospective, longitudinal study of 279 infants with verified NH and HL, including conductive, sensorineural, and mixed types that were enrolled from a well-baby nursery and two neonatal intensive care units in Cincinnati, Ohio. At approximately 1 month of age, DPOAEs (1-8 kHz), wideband absorbance (0.25-8 kHz), and air and bone conduction diagnostic tone burst auditory brainstem response (0.5-4 kHz) thresholds were measured. Hearing status was verified at approximately 9 months of age with visual reinforcement audiometry (0.5-4 kHz). Auditory brainstem response air conduction thresholds were used to assign infants to an NH or HL group, and the efficacy of DPOAE data to classify ears as NH or HL was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Two summary statistics of the ROC curve were calculated: the area under the ROC curve and the point of symmetry on the curve at which the sensitivity and specificity were equal. DPOAE level and signal to noise ratio cutoff values were defined at each frequency as the symmetry point on their respective ROC curve, and DPOAE results were combined across frequency in a multifrequency analysis to predict the presence of HL. RESULTS: Single-frequency test performance of DPOAEs was best at mid to high frequencies (3-8 kHz) with intermediate performance at 1.5 and 2 kHz and chance performance at 1 kHz. Infants with a conductive component to their HL (CHL and MHL combined) displayed significantly lower ambient absorbance values than the NH group. No differences in ambient absorbance were found between the NH and SNHL groups. Multifrequency analysis resulted in the best prediction of HL for the SNHL/MHL group with poorer sensitivity values when infants with CHL were included. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical interpretation of DPOAEs in infants can be improved by using age-appropriate normative ranges and optimized cutoff values. DPOAE interpretation is most predictive at higher F2 test frequencies in young infants (2-8 kHz) due to poor test performance at 1 to 1.5 kHz. Multifrequency rules can be used to improve sensitivity while balancing specificity. Last, a sensitive middle ear measure such as wideband absorbance should be included in the test battery to assess possibility of a conductive component to the HL.
Authors: Yi-Wen Liu; Chris A Sanford; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga; Douglas H Keefe Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: J E Widen; R C Folsom; B Cone-Wesson; L Carty; J J Dunnell; K Koebsell; A Levi; L Mancl; B Ohlrich; S Trouba; M P Gorga; Y S Sininger; B R Vohr; S J Norton Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: S J Norton; M P Gorga; J E Widen; R C Folsom; Y Sininger; B Cone-Wesson; B R Vohr; K A Fletcher Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Alaaeldin M Elsayed; Lisa L Hunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Jareen K Meinzen-Derr; Kelly Baroch; Maureen Sullivan-Mahoney; Kara Francis; Leigh G Schaid Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2015 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Lisa L Hunter; Chelsea M Blankenship; Rebekah G Gunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Kelly Baroch Journal: J Am Acad Audiol Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 1.664
Authors: W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Edyta Pilka; Malgorzata Ganc; Krzysztof Kochanek; Henryk Skarzynski Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-14 Impact factor: 3.390