Literature DB >> 6480525

The microstructure of quiet and masked thresholds.

G R Long.   

Abstract

Factors leading to the microstructure of the audiogram (a constant pattern of threshold maxima and minima as a function of frequency) are shown to influence masked thresholds, changing the shape of masking functions when both constant and variable tonal maskers are used. Simultaneous masking with broadband noise gradually reduces the difference between threshold maxima and minima until no further differences can be seen when masked thresholds are above 40-50 dB SPL. Nonsimultaneous masking with broadband noise reveals a changed microstructure when thresholds are elevated above 30-40 dB SPL. Thus in both simultaneous and nonsimultaneous masking the rate of threshold growth with increasing masker level is different for tones from threshold minima than for tones from threshold maxima. These psychophysical measures are related to measures of evoked cochlear emissions and the results are discussed in terms of the implications for understanding the cochlear mechanisms responsible for the microstructure and for the interpretation of psychophysical measures with low level stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6480525     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(84)90227-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  11 in total

1.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: cochlear-source contributions and clinical test performance.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Darcia M Dierking; Hongyang Tan; Connie Converse; Elizabeth Kennedy; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

3.  Limitations in the use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in objective audiometry as the result of fine structure.

Authors:  J Heitmann; B Waldmann; P K Plinkert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The spiral staircase: tonotopic microstructure and cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee; Torben Pastore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory attentional filter in the absence of masking noise.

Authors:  Elan Selvi Anandan; Ruby Husain; Kumar Seluakumaran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Basilar-membrane interference patterns from multiple internal reflection of cochlear traveling waves.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Nigel P Cooper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, threshold microstructure, and psychophysical tuning over a wide frequency range in humans.

Authors:  Rachael R Baiduc; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

10.  Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.