Literature DB >> 8618384

Dynamic models for sideways falls from standing height.

A J van den Kroonenberg1, W C Hayes, T A McMahon.   

Abstract

Despite our growing understanding of the importance of fall mechanics in the etiology of hip fracture, previous studies have largely ignored the kinematics and dynamics of falls from standing height. Beginning from basic principles, we estimated peak impact force on the greater trochanter in a sideways fall from standing height. Using a one degree-of-freedom impact model, this force is determined by the impact velocity of the hip, the effective mass of that part of the body that is moving prior to impact, and the overall stiffness of the soft tissue overlying the hip. To determine impact velocity and effective mass, three different paradigms of increasing complexity were used: 1) a falling point mass or a rigid bar pivoting at its base; 2) two-link models consisting of a leg segment and a torso; and 3) three-link models including a knee. The total mechanical energy of each model before falling was equated to the total mechanical energy just prior to impact in order to estimate the hip impact velocity. In addition, the configuration of the model just before impact was used to estimate the effective mass. Our model predictions were compared with the results of an earlier experimental study with young subjects falling on a 10-inch thick mattress. Values from literature were used to estimate the soft tissue stiffness. For the models, predicted values for hip impact velocity and effective mass ranged from 2.47 to 4.34 m/s and from 15.9 to 70.0 kg, respectively. Predicted values for the peak force applied to the greater trochanter ranged from 2.90k to 9.99k N. Based on comparisons to the experimental falls, impact velocity and impact force were best predicted by a simple two-link model with the trunk at 45 degrees to the vertical at impact. A three-link model with a quadratic spring incorporated in the knee of the model was the best predictor of effective mass. Using our most accurate model, the peak impact force was 2.90k N for a 5th percentile female and 4.26k N for a 95th percentile female, thereby confirming the widely held perception that "the bigger they are, the harder they fall".

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8618384     DOI: 10.1115/1.2794186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  24 in total

1.  Effect of pre-impact movement strategies on the impact forces resulting from a lateral fall.

Authors:  J Lo; J A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Sideways fall-induced impact force and its effect on hip fracture risk: a review.

Authors:  M Nasiri Sarvi; Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Test systems for the biomechanical evaluation of hip protectors: a systematic review.

Authors:  S A Yahaya; Z M Ripin; M I Z Ridzwan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Relationship of femoral neck areal bone mineral density to volumetric bone mineral density, bone size, and femoral strength in men and women.

Authors:  B Srinivasan; D L Kopperdahl; S Amin; E J Atkinson; J Camp; R A Robb; B L Riggs; E S Orwoll; L J Melton; T M Keaveny; S Khosla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 6.  On challenges in clinical assessment of hip fracture risk using image-based biomechanical modelling: a critical review.

Authors:  Yunhua Luo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Automated DXA-based finite element analysis for hip fracture risk stratification: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  S Yang; W D Leslie; Y Luo; A L Goertzen; S Ahmed; L M Ward; I Delubac; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Assessment of incident spine and hip fractures in women and men using finite element analysis of CT scans.

Authors:  David L Kopperdahl; Thor Aspelund; Paul F Hoffmann; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men.

Authors:  Eric S Orwoll; Lynn M Marshall; Carrie M Nielson; Steven R Cummings; Jodi Lapidus; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Nancy Lane; Paul R Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Use of DXA-based structural engineering models of the proximal femur to discriminate hip fracture.

Authors:  Lang Yang; Nicola Peel; Jackie A Clowes; Eugene V McCloskey; Richard Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.