Literature DB >> 18767924

Use of DXA-based structural engineering models of the proximal femur to discriminate hip fracture.

Lang Yang1, Nicola Peel, Jackie A Clowes, Eugene V McCloskey, Richard Eastell.   

Abstract

Several DXA-based structural engineering models (SEMs) of the proximal femur have been developed to estimate stress caused by sideway falls. Their usefulness in discriminating hip fracture has not yet been established and we therefore evaluated these models. The hip DXA scans of 51 postmenopausal women with hip fracture (30 femoral neck, 17 trochanteric, and 4 unspecified) and 153 age-, height-, and weight-matched controls were reanalyzed using a special version of Hologic's software that produced a pixel-by-pixel BMD map. For each map, a curved-beam, a curved composite-beam, and a finite element model were generated to calculate stress within the bone when falling sideways. An index of fracture risk (IFR) was defined over the femoral neck, trochanter, and total hip as the stress divided by the yield stress at each pixel and averaged over the regions of interest. Hip structure analysis (HSA) was also performed using Hologic APEX analysis software. Hip BMD and almost all parameters derived from HSA and SEM were discriminators of hip fracture on their own because their ORs were significantly >1. Because of the high correlation of total hip BMD to HSA and SEM-derived parameters, only the bone width discriminated hip fracture independently from total hip BMD. Judged by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, the trochanteric IFR derived from the finite element model was significant better than total hip BMD alone and similar to the total hip BMD plus bone width in discriminating all hip fracture and femoral neck fracture. No index was better than total hip BMD for discriminating trochanteric fractures. In conclusion, the finite element model has the potential to replace hip BMD in discriminating hip fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18767924      PMCID: PMC3101378          DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.080906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  40 in total

1.  Experimental testing of a DEXA-derived curved beam model of the proximal femur.

Authors:  T J Beck; F A Mourtada; C B Ruff; W W Scott; G Kao
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Curved beam model of the proximal femur for estimating stress using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry derived structural geometry.

Authors:  F A Mourtada; T J Beck; D L Hauser; C B Ruff; G Bao
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Dynamic models for sideways falls from standing height.

Authors:  A J van den Kroonenberg; W C Hayes; T A McMahon
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Better discrimination of hip fracture using bone density, geometry and architecture.

Authors:  M Peacock; C H Turner; G Liu; A K Manatunga; L Timmerman; C C Johnston
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Risk of fracture in elderly patients: a new predictive index based on bone mineral density and finite element analysis.

Authors:  D Testi; M Viceconti; F Baruffaldi; A Cappello
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Different morphometric and densitometric parameters predict cervical and trochanteric hip fracture: the EPIDOS Study.

Authors:  F Duboeuf; D Hans; A M Schott; P O Kotzki; F Favier; C Marcelli; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Femoral neck geometry and radiographic signs of osteoporosis as predictors of hip fracture.

Authors:  K M Karlsson; I Sernbo; K J Obrant; I Redlund-Johnell; O Johnell
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Bone mineral density, body mass index, and hip axis length in postmenopausal cretan women with cervical and trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  E K Dretakis; E Papakitsou; G M Kontakis; K Dretakis; S Psarakis; K A Steriopoulos
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Bone mass and structure at the hip in men and women over the age of 60 years.

Authors:  M Peacock; G Liu; M Carey; W Ambrosius; C H Turner; S Hui; C C Johnston
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; S R Cummings; D Black; L Palermo; C C Glüer; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  24 in total

1.  A poisson process model for hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Zvi Schechner; Gangming Luo; Jonathan J Kaufman; Robert S Siffert
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Computed tomography-based finite element analysis to assess fracture risk and osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Imai
Journal:  World J Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-20

Review 3.  Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images.

Authors:  Dieter H Pahr; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 4.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Applications of a New Handheld Reference Point Indentation Instrument Measuring Bone Material Strength.

Authors:  Connor Randall; Daniel Bridges; Roberto Guerri; Xavier Nogues; Lluis Puig; Elisa Torres; Leonardo Mellibovsky; Kevin Hoffseth; Tyler Stalbaum; Ananya Srikanth; James C Weaver; Sasha Rosen; Heather Barnard; Davis Brimer; Alex Proctor; James Candy; Christopher Saldana; Srinivasan Chandrasekar; Timothy Lescun; Carrie M Nielson; Eric Orwoll; Doug Herthel; Hal Kopeikin; Henry T Y Yang; Joshua N Farr; Louise McCready; Sundeep Khosla; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Paul K Hansma
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 0.582

6.  Age-related periosteal expansion at femoral neck among elderly women may maintain bending stiffness, but not femoral strength.

Authors:  Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  On challenges in clinical assessment of hip fracture risk using image-based biomechanical modelling: a critical review.

Authors:  Yunhua Luo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 8.  Imaging technologies for assessment of skeletal health in men.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Prediction of hip osteoporotic fractures from composite indices of femoral neck strength.

Authors:  Guan-Wu Li; Shi-Xin Chang; Zheng Xu; Yao Chen; Hong Bao; Xiao Shi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  A biomechanical sorting of clinical risk factors affecting osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.