Literature DB >> 31446442

Test systems for the biomechanical evaluation of hip protectors: a systematic review.

S A Yahaya1,2, Z M Ripin3, M I Z Ridzwan3.   

Abstract

Various mechanical and biomechanical test systems to evaluate the effectiveness of hip protectors designed to prevent hip fracture as a result of falls were examined in this review. The articles considered were selected systematically. The effect of differences in design criteria was demonstrated, and it was observed that the impact energy employed during testing dramatically affects the performance of the hip protector. Over the past three decades, researchers have continuously experimented with various systems to determine the efficacy of various hip protectors. The primary aim has been to make informed decisions in optimizing hip protector design. This article provides a systematic review of various test systems employed in the determination of the biomechanical efficacy of hip protectors. A systematic literature search was carried out, and 28 relevant articles were included to demonstrate the effect of test systems in the evaluation of the biomechanical effectiveness of hip protectors. Methodological studies illustrated the appropriate use of impact testing systems for the simulation of hip anatomy and fall dynamics in evaluating the effectiveness of hip protectors in preventing a hip fracture. This systematic review has demonstrated the effect of the variability of test systems on the evaluation of impact attenuation by various hip protectors. The lack of standardized test systems accounts for the inconsistencies in the test results of the efficacy of hip protectors. This has been a major challenge in the efforts of researchers to optimize the interventions. The standardization of test systems may require needed improvements immediately as opposed to the development of new interventions in order to ensure that only hip protectors with adequately proven efficacies are deployed for clinical trials or for the protection of the hips of vulnerable individuals from sideways impact.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanical effectiveness; Fracture; Hip pad; Hip protector; Mechanical testing; Osteoporotic hip

Year:  2019        PMID: 31446442     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05128-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  65 in total

1.  The force attenuation provided by hip protectors depends on impact velocity, pelvic size, and soft tissue stiffness.

Authors:  Andrew C Laing; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  The effect of positioning on the biomechanical performance of soft shell hip protectors.

Authors:  W J Choi; J A Hoffer; S N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Cost-effectiveness of preventing hip fractures by hip protectors in elderly institutionalized residents in Germany.

Authors:  Afschin Gandjour; Eva-Julia Weyler
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Impact direction from a fall influences the failure load of the proximal femur as much as age-related bone loss.

Authors:  T P Pinilla; K C Boardman; M L Bouxsein; E R Myers; W C Hayes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Characterizing the effective stiffness of the pelvis during sideways falls on the hip.

Authors:  Andrew C Laing; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Hip fractures: incidence, risk factors, energy absorption, and prevention.

Authors:  J B Lauritzen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Protection against hip fractures by energy absorption.

Authors:  J B Lauritzen; V Askegaard
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  1992-02

8.  Cost-equivalence of different osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  L J Melton; S E Gabriel; C S Crowson; A N A Tosteson; O Johnell; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Efficacy of a hip protector to prevent hip fracture in nursing home residents: the HIP PRO randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Douglas P Kiel; Jay Magaziner; Sheryl Zimmerman; Linda Ball; Bruce A Barton; Kathleen M Brown; Judith P Stone; Dawn Dewkett; Stanley J Birge
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Effects of trochanteric soft tissue thickness and hip impact velocity on hip fracture in sideways fall through 3D finite element simulations.

Authors:  Santanu Majumder; Amit Roychowdhury; Subrata Pal
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Influence of Fall Direction and Hip Protector on Fracture Risk: FE Model Predictions Driven by Experimental Data.

Authors:  Ellie S Galliker; Andrew C Laing; Stephen J Ferguson; Benedikt Helgason; Ingmar Fleps
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.934

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.