Literature DB >> 31878356

Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Amadeus C S de Alcântara1, Israel Assis2, Daniel Prada1, Konrad Mehle3, Stefan Schwan4, Lucia Costa-Paiva5, Munir S Skaf6, Luiz C Wrobel7,8, Paulo Sollero1.   

Abstract

This paper provides a starting point for researchers and practitioners from biology, medicine, physics and engineering who can benefit from an up-to-date literature survey on patient-specific bone fracture modelling, simulation and risk analysis. This survey hints at a framework for devising realistic patient-specific bone fracture simulations. This paper has 18 sections: Section 1 presents the main interested parties; Section 2 explains the organzation of the text; Section 3 motivates further work on patient-specific bone fracture simulation; Section 4 motivates this survey; Section 5 concerns the collection of bibliographical references; Section 6 motivates the physico-mathematical approach to bone fracture; Section 7 presents the modelling of bone as a continuum; Section 8 categorizes the surveyed literature into a continuum mechanics framework; Section 9 concerns the computational modelling of bone geometry; Section 10 concerns the estimation of bone mechanical properties; Section 11 concerns the selection of boundary conditions representative of bone trauma; Section 12 concerns bone fracture simulation; Section 13 presents the multiscale structure of bone; Section 14 concerns the multiscale mathematical modelling of bone; Section 15 concerns the experimental validation of bone fracture simulations; Section 16 concerns bone fracture risk assessment. Lastly, glossaries for symbols, acronyms, and physico-mathematical terms are provided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone fracture; bone multiscale modelling; bone multiscale structure; fracture risk analysis; osteoporosis; patient-specific bone models

Year:  2019        PMID: 31878356      PMCID: PMC6981613          DOI: 10.3390/ma13010106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Materials (Basel)        ISSN: 1996-1944            Impact factor:   3.623


  353 in total

1.  Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models.

Authors:  H Weinans; D R Sumner; R Igloria; R N Natarajan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results.

Authors:  C A Engh; J D Bobyn; A H Glassman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-01

3.  Modelling of bone fracture and strength at different length scales: a review.

Authors:  Fereshteh A Sabet; Ahmad Raeisi Najafi; Elham Hamed; Iwona Jasiuk
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models.

Authors:  Joyce H Keyak; Tadashi S Kaneko; Jamshid Tehranzadeh; Harry B Skinner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Plastic deformation in pediatric fractures: mechanism and treatment.

Authors:  J D Mabrey; R D Fitch
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Alan K Ogelsby
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Micro-Finite Element analysis will overestimate the compressive stiffness of fractured cancellous bone.

Authors:  Andrés Julián Arias-Moreno; Keita Ito; Bert van Rietbergen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Classification of women with and without hip fracture based on quantitative computed tomography and finite element analysis.

Authors:  K K Nishiyama; M Ito; A Harada; S K Boyd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  The impact of fragility fracture and approaches to osteoporosis risk assessment worldwide.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Curtis; Rebecca J Moon; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Cost-benefit analysis of calcium and vitamin D supplements.

Authors:  Connie M Weaver; Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari; Christopher J Shanahan
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 2.617

View more
  2 in total

1.  Direct electromagnetic coupling to determine diagnostic bone fracture stiffness.

Authors:  Jakob G Wolynski; Milan M Ilić; Kevin M Labus; Branislav M Notaroš; Christian M Puttlitz; Kirk C McGilvray
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-05

2.  Devising Bone Molecular Models at the Nanoscale: From Usual Mineralized Collagen Fibrils to the First Bone Fibers Including Hydroxyapatite in the Extra-Fibrillar Volume.

Authors:  Amadeus C S Alcântara; Levi C Felix; Douglas S Galvão; Paulo Sollero; Munir S Skaf
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.