Literature DB >> 19049327

Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men.

Eric S Orwoll1, Lynn M Marshall, Carrie M Nielson, Steven R Cummings, Jodi Lapidus, Jane A Cauley, Kristine Ensrud, Nancy Lane, Paul R Hoffmann, David L Kopperdahl, Tony M Keaveny.   

Abstract

Low areal BMD (aBMD) is associated with increased risk of hip fracture, but many hip fractures occur in persons without low aBMD. Finite element (FE) analysis of QCT scans provides a measure of hip strength. We studied the association of FE measures with risk of hip fracture in older men. A prospective case-cohort study of all first hip fractures (n = 40) and a random sample (n = 210) of nonfracture cases from 3549 community-dwelling men > or =65 yr of age used baseline QCT scans of the hip (mean follow-up, 5.6 yr). Analyses included FE measures of strength and load-to-strength ratio and BMD by DXA. Hazard ratios (HRs) for hip fracture were estimated with proportional hazards regression. Both femoral strength (HR per SD change = 13.1; 95% CI: 3.9-43.5) and the load-to-strength ratio (HR = 4.0; 95% CI: 2.7-6.0) were strongly associated with hip fracture risk, as was aBMD as measured by DXA (HR = 5.1; 95% CI: 2.8-9.2). After adjusting for age, BMI, and study site, the associations remained significant (femoral strength HR = 6.5, 95% CI: 2.3-18.3; load-to-strength ratio HR = 4.3, 95% CI: 2.5-7.4; aBMD HR = 4.4, 95% CI: 2.1-9.1). When adjusted additionally for aBMD, the load-to-strength ratio remained significantly associated with fracture (HR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.6-6.1). These results provide insight into hip fracture etiology and demonstrate the ability of FE-based biomechanical analysis of QCT scans to prospectively predict hip fractures in men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19049327      PMCID: PMC2659519          DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.081201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  59 in total

1.  Analysis of case-cohort designs.

Authors:  W E Barlow; L Ichikawa; D Rosner; S Izumi
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Biomechanics of trabecular bone.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; E F Morgan; G L Niebur; O C Yeh
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.590

3.  Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site.

Authors:  E F Morgan; T M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Factor of risk for hip fracture in normal Chinese men and women in Taiwan.

Authors:  R S Yang; T K Liu; Y S Hang; P U Chieng; K S Tsai
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  An improved method for finite element mesh generation of geometrically complex structures with application to the skullbase.

Authors:  D L Camacho; R H Hopper; G M Lin; B S Myers
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models.

Authors:  J H Keyak
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling.

Authors:  J H Keyak; S A Rossi; K A Jones; H B Skinner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Osteoporosis changes the amount of vertebral trabecular bone at risk of fracture but not the vertebral load distribution.

Authors:  J Homminga; H Weinans; W Gowin; D Felsenberg; R Huiskes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Biomechanics of osteoporosis and vertebral fracture.

Authors:  E R Myers; S E Wilson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Relationships between femoral fracture loads for two load configurations.

Authors:  J H Keyak
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  96 in total

1.  Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength-Inter-operator reanalysis precision.

Authors:  David C Lee; Paul F Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  A poisson process model for hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Zvi Schechner; Gangming Luo; Jonathan J Kaufman; Robert S Siffert
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Bone Imaging and Fracture Risk after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  W Brent Edwards; Thomas J Schnitzer
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 4.  Advanced CT based in vivo methods for the assessment of bone density, structure, and strength.

Authors:  K Engelke; C Libanati; T Fuerst; P Zysset; H K Genant
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Risk factors for fracture in middle-age and older-age men of African descent.

Authors:  Yahtyng Sheu; Jane A Cauley; Alan L Patrick; Victor W Wheeler; Clareann H Bunker; Joseph M Zmuda
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Cost-effectiveness of Virtual Bone Strength Testing in Osteoporosis Screening Programs for Postmenopausal Women in the United States.

Authors:  Christoph A Agten; Austin J Ramme; Stella Kang; Stephen Honig; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Predicting mouse vertebra strength with micro-computed tomography-derived finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Alexander J Makowski; Barbara J Rowland; Alyssa R Merkel; Julie A Sterling; Todd L Bredbenner; Daniel S Perrien
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-04-22

8.  Effects of densitometry, material mapping and load estimation uncertainties on the accuracy of patient-specific finite-element models of the scapula.

Authors:  Gianni Campoli; Bart Bolsterlee; Frans van der Helm; Harrie Weinans; Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  C-reactive protein, bone strength, and nine-year fracture risk: data from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Shinya Ishii; Jane A Cauley; Gail A Greendale; Carolyn J Crandall; Michelle E Danielson; Yasuyoshi Ouchi; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Left-right differences in the proximal femur's strength of post-menopausal women: a multicentric finite element study.

Authors:  F Taddei; C Falcinelli; L Balistreri; P Henys; F Baruffaldi; S Sigurdsson; V Gudnason; T B Harris; R Dietzel; G Armbrecht; S Boutroy; E Schileo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.