Literature DB >> 8618103

The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli.

E A Wasserman1, J L Gagliardi, B R Cook, K Kirkpatrick-Steger, S L Astley, I Biederman.   

Abstract

Four experiments used a four-choice discrimination learning paradigm to explore the pigeon's recognition of line drawings of four objects (an airplane, a chair, a desk lamp, and a flashlight) that were rotated in depth. The pigeons reliably generalized discriminative responding to pictorial stimuli over all untrained depth rotations, despite the bird's having been trained at only a single depth orientation. These generalization gradients closely resembled those found in prior research that used other stimulus dimensions. Increasing the number of different vantage points in the training set from one to three broadened the range of generalized testing performance, with wider spacing of the training orientations more effectively broadening generalized responding. Template and geon theories of visual recognition are applied to these empirical results.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8618103     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.22.2.205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  15 in total

1.  Recognizing rotated views of objects: interpolation versus generalization by humans and pigeons.

Authors:  Marcia L Spetch; Alinda Friedman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

2.  Recognition of static and dynamic images of depth-rotated human faces by pigeons.

Authors:  Masako Jitsumori; Hiroshi Makino
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Visual object categorization in birds and primates: integrating behavioral, neurobiological, and computational evidence within a "general process" framework.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  View-invariance learning in object recognition by pigeons depends on error-driven associative learning processes.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Jeffrey Y M Siow; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Integrality/separability of stimulus dimensions and multidimensional generalization in pigeons.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-04

6.  Limits of dynamic object perception in pigeons: dynamic stimulus presentation does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape.

Authors:  Michaela Loidolt; Ulrike Aust; Michael Steurer; Nikolaus F Troje; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Dynamic object recognition in pigeons and humans.

Authors:  Marcia L Spetch; Alinda Friedman; Quoc C Vuong
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Elemental versus configural perception in a people-present/people-absent discrimination task by pigeons.

Authors:  Ulrike Aust; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  The development of newborn object recognition in fast and slow visual worlds.

Authors:  Justin N Wood; Samantha M W Wood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Promoting rotational-invariance in object recognition despite experience with only a single view.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.