Literature DB >> 22531015

View-invariance learning in object recognition by pigeons depends on error-driven associative learning processes.

Fabian A Soto1, Jeffrey Y M Siow, Edward A Wasserman.   

Abstract

A model hypothesizing that basic mechanisms of associative learning and generalization underlie object categorization in vertebrates can account for a large body of animal and human data. Here, we report two experiments which implicate error-driven associative learning in pigeons' recognition of objects across changes in viewpoint. Experiment 1 found that object recognition across changes in viewpoint depends on how well each view predicts reward. Analyses of generalization performance, spatial position of pecks to images, and learning curves all showed behavioral patterns analogous to those found in prior studies of relative validity in associative learning. In Experiment 2, pigeons were trained to recognize objects from multiple viewpoints, which usually promotes robust performance at novel views of the trained objects. However, when the objects possessed a salient, informative metric property for solving the task, the pigeons did not show view-invariant recognition of the training objects, a result analogous to the overshadowing effect in associative learning.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22531015      PMCID: PMC3361566          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  51 in total

Review 1.  Models of object recognition.

Authors:  M Riesenhuber; T Poggio
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Learning an object from multiple views enhances its recognition in an orthogonal rotational axis in pigeons.

Authors:  Jessie J Peissig; Edward A Wasserman; Michael E Young; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Attention-gated reinforcement learning of internal representations for classification.

Authors:  Pieter R Roelfsema; Arjen van Ooyen
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  T Poggio; S Edelman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  View-invariant object recognition ability develops after discrimination, not mere exposure, at several viewing angles.

Authors:  Wakayo Yamashita; Gang Wang; Keiji Tanaka
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Effect of reward probability on spatial and temporal variation.

Authors:  W David Stahlman; Seth Roberts; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans.

Authors:  M L Spetch; A Friedman; S L Reid
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-06

9.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Invariance in visual object recognition requires training: a computational argument.

Authors:  Robbe L T Goris; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Colour, vision and coevolution in avian brood parasitism.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Subsampling of cues in associative learning.

Authors:  Omar D Perez; Edgar H Vogel; Sanjay Narasiwodeyar; Fabian A Soto
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.699

3.  Promoting rotational-invariance in object recognition despite experience with only a single view.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 5.  Spontaneous object recognition: a promising approach to the comparative study of memory.

Authors:  Rachel Blaser; Charles Heyser
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  A chicken model for studying the emergence of invariant object recognition.

Authors:  Samantha M W Wood; Justin N Wood
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.492

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.