Literature DB >> 22086545

Visual object categorization in birds and primates: integrating behavioral, neurobiological, and computational evidence within a "general process" framework.

Fabian A Soto1, Edward A Wasserman.   

Abstract

Previous comparative work has suggested that the mechanisms of object categorization differ importantly for birds and primates. However, behavioral and neurobiological differences do not preclude the possibility that at least some of those mechanisms are shared across these evolutionarily distant groups. The present study integrates behavioral, neurobiological, and computational evidence concerning the "general processes" that are involved in object recognition in vertebrates. We start by reviewing work implicating error-driven learning in object categorization by birds and primates, and also consider neurobiological evidence suggesting that the basal ganglia might implement this process. We then turn to work with a computational model showing that principles of visual processing discovered in the primate brain can account for key behavioral findings in object recognition by pigeons, including cases in which pigeons' behavior differs from that of people. These results provide a proof of concept that the basic principles of visual shape processing are similar across distantly related vertebrate species, thereby offering important insights into the evolution of visual cognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22086545     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-011-0070-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  102 in total

1.  Pattern and process in the evolution of learning.

Authors:  Mauricio R Papini
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Learning an object from multiple views enhances its recognition in an orthogonal rotational axis in pigeons.

Authors:  Jessie J Peissig; Edward A Wasserman; Michael E Young; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Topographic arrangement of the rotundo-entopallial projection in the pigeon (Columba livia).

Authors:  Felipe Fredes; Sebastian Tapia; Juan Carlos Letelier; Gonzalo Marín; Jorge Mpodozis
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Feedforward construction of the receptive field and orientation selectivity of visual neurons in the pigeon.

Authors:  Da-Peng Li; Qian Xiao; Shu-Rong Wang
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  Basal ganglia and dopamine contributions to probabilistic category learning.

Authors:  D Shohamy; C E Myers; J Kalanithi; M A Gluck
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  A canonical neural circuit for cortical nonlinear operations.

Authors:  Minjoon Kouh; Tomaso Poggio
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 7.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans.

Authors:  M L Spetch; A Friedman; S L Reid
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-06

9.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  Corticocortical connections in the visual system: structure and function.

Authors:  P A Salin; J Bullier
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 37.312

View more
  13 in total

1.  Higher-level pattern features provide additional information to birds when recognizing and rejecting parasitic eggs.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Benedict G Hogan; Martin Stevens; Claire N Spottiswoode
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  View-invariance learning in object recognition by pigeons depends on error-driven associative learning processes.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Jeffrey Y M Siow; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: Pigeons (Columba livia) and crows (Corvus macrorhynchos) do not perceive emergent configurations.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Goto; Shigeru Watanabe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Using the reassignment procedure to test object representation in pigeons and people.

Authors:  Jessie J Peissig; Yasuo Nagasaka; Michael E Young; Edward A Wasserman; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Promoting rotational-invariance in object recognition despite experience with only a single view.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Pigeons exhibit flexibility but not rule formation in dimensional learning, stimulus generalization, and task switching.

Authors:  Ellen M O'Donoghue; Matthew B Broschard; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.478

7.  How visual system configuration can play a role in individual recognition: a visual modeling study.

Authors:  Rebecca Trapp; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Discrimination of human faces by archerfish (Toxotes chatareus).

Authors:  Cait Newport; Guy Wallis; Yarema Reshitnyk; Ulrike E Siebeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Pigeons (Columba livia) as Trainable Observers of Pathology and Radiology Breast Cancer Images.

Authors:  Richard M Levenson; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Victor M Navarro; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.