Literature DB >> 18231784

Trial-to-trial size variability of motor-evoked potentials. A study using the triple stimulation technique.

Kai M Rösler1, Denise M Roth, Michel R Magistris.   

Abstract

Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) vary in size from one stimulus to the next. The objective of this study was to determine the cause and source of trial-to-trial MEP size variability. In two experiments involving 10 and 14 subjects, the variability of MEPs to cortical stimulation (cortical-MEPs) in abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and abductor hallucis (AH) was compared to those responses obtained using the triple stimulation technique (cortical-TST). The TST eliminates the effects of motor neuron (MN) response desynchronization and of repetitive MN discharges. Submaximal stimuli were used in both techniques. In six subjects, cortical-MEP variability was compared to that of brainstem-MEP and brainstem-TST. Variability was greater for MEPs than that for TST responses, by approximately one-third. The variability was the same for cortical- and brainstem-MEPs and was similar in ADM and AH. Variability concerned at least 10-15% of the MN pool innervating the target muscle. With the stimulation parameters used, repetitive MN discharges did not influence variability. For submaximal stimuli, approximately two-third of the observed MEP size variability is caused by the variable number of recruited alpha-MNs and approximately one-third by changing synchronization of MN discharges. The source of variability is most likely localized at the spinal segmental level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18231784     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1278-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Assessment of central motor conduction to intrinsic hand muscles using the triple stimulation technique: normal values and repeatability.

Authors:  A M Humm; W J Z'Graggen; N E von Hornstein; M R Magistris; K M Rösler
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  L Kiers; D Cros; K H Chiappa; J Fang
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-12

3.  Task-dependent facilitation of motor evoked potentials during dynamic and steady muscle contractions.

Authors:  Z Arányi; J Mathis; C W Hess; K M Rösler
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Magnetic stimulation of the human brain: facilitation of motor responses by voluntary contraction of ipsilateral and contralateral muscles with additional observations on an amputee.

Authors:  C W Hess; K R Mills; N M Murray
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1986-11-11       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 2. Multiple descending volleys.

Authors:  B L Day; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; J P Dick; J M Cowan; A Berardelli; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Normal limits of side-to-side H-reflex amplitude variability.

Authors:  W R Jankus; L R Robinson; J W Little
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Sciatic nerve motor conduction velocity study.

Authors:  C B Yap; T Hirota
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Further evidence for corticomotor hyperexcitability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  D Naka; K R Mills
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Variability of motor-evoked potentials recorded during nitrous oxide anesthesia from the tibialis anterior muscle after transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  I J Woodforth; R G Hicks; M R Crawford; J P Stephen; D J Burke
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Trial-to-trial variability of corticospinal volleys in human subjects.

Authors:  D Burke; R Hicks; J Stephen; I Woodforth; M Crawford
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-10
View more
  18 in total

1.  Neuronavigation increases the physiologic and behavioral effects of low-frequency rTMS of primary motor cortex in healthy subjects.

Authors:  S Bashir; D Edwards; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Speech dynamics are coded in the left motor cortex in fluent speakers but not in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Nicole E Neef; T N Linh Hoang; Andreas Neef; Walter Paulus; Martin Sommer
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Desynchronization does not contribute to intracortical inhibition and facilitation: a paired-pulse paradigm study combined with TST.

Authors:  L Caranzano; M A Stephan; F R Herrmann; D H Benninger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

5.  Statistical Model of Motor-Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; S M Mahdi Alavi; Zhi-De Deng; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.

Authors:  Jared Cooney Horvath; Simon J Vogrin; Olivia Carter; Mark J Cook; Jason D Forte
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Cerebellar noninvasive neuromodulation influences the reactivity of the contralateral primary motor cortex and surrounding areas: a TMS-EMG-EEG study.

Authors:  Rocchi L; Spampinato DA; Pezzopane V; Orth M; Bisiacchi Ps; Rothwell Jc; Casula Ep
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Isolating two sources of variability of subcortical stimulation to quantify fluctuations of corticospinal tract excitability.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Bryan Howell; Boshuo Wang; Zhongxi Li; Marc A Sommer; Angel V Peterchev; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.861

10.  Pinging the brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals cortical reactivity in time and space.

Authors:  Sangtae Ahn; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.