Literature DB >> 17221265

Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra- and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations.

M R Weinzierl1, P Reinacher, J M Gilsbach, V Rohde.   

Abstract

The primary objective of neurophysiologic monitoring during surgery is to avoid permanent neurological injury resulting from surgical manipulation. To prevent motor deficits, either somatosensory (SSEP) or transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP) are applied. This prospective study was conducted to evaluate if the combined use of SSEP and MEP might be beneficial. Combined SSEP/MEP monitoring was attempted in 100 consecutive procedures, including intracranial and spinal operations. Repetitive transcranial electric motor cortex stimulation was used to elicit MEP from muscles of the upper and lower limb. Stimulation of the tibial and median nerves was performed to record SSEP. Critical SSEP/MEP changes were defined as decreases in amplitude of more than 50% or increases in latency of more than 10% of baseline values. The operation was paused or the surgical strategy was modified in every case of SSEP/MEP changes. Combined SSEP/MEP monitoring was possible in 69 out of 100 operations. In 49 of the 69 operations (71%), SSEP/ MEP were stable, and the patients remained neurologically intact. Critical SSEP/ MEP changes were seen in six operations. Critical MEP changes with stable SSEP occurred in 12 operations. Overall, critical MEP changes were recorded in 18 operations (26%). In 12 of the 18 operations, MEP recovered to some extent after modification of the surgical strategy, and the patients either showed no (n = 10) or only a transient motor deficit (n = 2). In the remaining six operations, MEP did not recover and the patients either had a transient (n = 3) or a permanent (n = 3) motor deficit. Critical SSEP changes with stable MEP were observed in two operations; both patients did not show a new motor deficit. Our data again confirm that MEP monitoring is superior to SSEP monitoring in detecting impending impairment of the functional integrity of cerebral and spinal cord motor pathways during surgery. Detection of MEP changes and adjustment of the surgical strategy might allow to prevent irreversible pyramidal tract damage. Stable SSEP/MEP recordings reassure the surgeon that motor function is still intact and surgery can be continued safely. The combined SSEP/ MEP monitoring becomes advantageous, if one modality is not recordable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17221265     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-006-0061-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  27 in total

1.  Neurological complications of anterior spinal surgery for kyphosis with normal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs).

Authors:  L Pelosi; A Jardine; J K Webb
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumor resection.

Authors:  V Deletis; A B Camargo
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex.

Authors:  T Kombos; O Suess; O Ciklatekerlio; M Brock
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 4.  Motor evoked potential monitoring for the surgery of brain tumours and vascular malformations.

Authors:  G Neuloh; J Schramm
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  2004

5.  Intraoperative monitoring.

Authors:  K F Kothbauer; V Deletis; F J Epstein
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.162

Review 6.  Somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  V Gugino; R J Chabot
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  1990

Review 7.  Intraoperative monitoring of the functional integrity of the motor pathways.

Authors:  V Deletis
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1993

8.  Subcortical strokes from intracranial aneurysm surgery: implications for intraoperative neuromonitoring.

Authors:  N R Holland
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.177

9.  Permissible temporary occlusion time in aneurysm surgery as evaluated by evoked potential monitoring.

Authors:  K Mizoi; T Yoshimoto
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Variability of motor-evoked potentials recorded during nitrous oxide anesthesia from the tibialis anterior muscle after transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  I J Woodforth; R G Hicks; M R Crawford; J P Stephen; D J Burke
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Jong-Hwa Park; Seung-Jae Hyun
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Machine Learning Application of Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential to Predict Positive Functional Outcomes of Patients.

Authors:  Mohd Redzuan Jamaludin; Khin Wee Lai; Joon Huang Chuah; Muhammad Afiq Zaki; Khairunnisa Hasikin; Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak; Samiappan Dhanalakshmi; Lim Beng Saw; Xiang Wu
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-20

3.  A role for motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for patients without myelopathy: Analysis of 57 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Risheng Xu; Eva K Ritzl; Mohammed Sait; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Timothy F Witham; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-09-30

4.  Variety of the Wave Change in Compound Muscle Action Potential in an Animal Model.

Authors:  Zenya Ito; Shiro Imagama; Kei Ando; Akio Muramoto; Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Tetsuro Hida; Kenyu Ito; Yoshimoto Ishikawa; Mikito Tsushima; Akiyuki Matsumoto; Satoshi Tanaka; Masayoshi Morozumi; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-12-08

5.  Do Intraoperative Neurophysiological Changes During Decompressive Surgery for Cervical Myeloradiculopathy Affect Functional Outcome? A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Keyur Kantilal Akbari; Vigneshwara Badikillaya; Muralidharan Venkatesan; Sajan K Hegde
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-22

6.  What Is the Best Multimodality Combination for Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring of Motor Function? A Multicenter Study by the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

Authors:  Zenya Ito; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Muneharu Ando; Shigenori Kawabata; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Kazunobu Kida; Yasushi Fujiwara; Kei Yamada; Naoya Yamamoto; Sho Kobayashi; Takanori Saito; Kanichiro Wada; Kazuhiko Satomi; Kenichi Shinomiya; Toshikazu Tani
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-07-31

7.  Monitoring of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials During Spine Surgery: Intraoperative Changes and Postoperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Shin Hye Chang; Yoon Ghil Park; Dae Hyun Kim; Seo Yeon Yoon
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-06-29

8.  Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgeries: The Experience at a Spine Centre through Years.

Authors:  Deepak Rajappa; Mohd Mazhar Khan; Dheeraj Masapu; Ravi Manchala; Satish Rudrappa; Swaroop Gopal; Ramachandran Govindasamy; Sunil Kumar Horasuku
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-12-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.