Literature DB >> 8597517

The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and cholangiography in the laparoscopic era.

J Korman1, J Cosgrove, M Furman, I Nathan, J Cohen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors reviewed the results of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and intraoperative cholangiography in a series of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The indications for preoperative and postoperative ERCP and intraoperative cholangiography as adjuncts to laparoscopic cholecystectomy are evolving. The debate regarding the use of selective or routine intraoperative cholangiography has intensified with the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: The authors reviewed the records of 343 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during a 1-year period. Historical, biochemical, and radiologic findings for the patients who underwent ERCP and intraoperative cholangiography were analyzed.
RESULTS: Three hundred forty- three patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the period reviewed. Preoperative ERCP was performed in 42 patients. Twenty-seven of these patients (64%) had common bile duct (CBD) stones, which were cleared with a sphincterotomy. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed for 101 patients (29%). Three cholangiograms had false- positive results (3%), leading to two CBD explorations, in which no CBD stones were found, and one normal ERCP. Six patients underwent postoperative ERCP, three for the removal of retained CBD stones (0.9%), all of which were cleared with a sphincterotomy. Fifteen patients had gallstone pancreatitis, six of whom had CBD stones (40%) that were cleared by ERCP. There were 33 complications (10%) and no CBD injuries.
CONCLUSION: The use of routine intraoperative cholangiography is discouraged in view of its low yield and the significant rate of false positive cholangiogram results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8597517      PMCID: PMC1235099          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199602000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  21 in total

1.  Laparoscopic trancystic choledocholithotomy as an adjunct to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J M Sackier; G Berci; M Paz-Partlow
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Common bile duct evaluation in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 1050 cases later.

Authors:  C R Voyles; D L Sanders; R Hogan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Routine vs selective policy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; S Shimi; S Banting; L K Nathanson; A Pietrabissa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Intravenous cholangiography, ERCP, and selective operative cholangiography in the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  B Salky; J Bauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The utility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  G S Ferzli; A Massaad; T Kiel; M H Worth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Implications for common bile duct injury and retained common bile duct stones.

Authors:  J S Barkun; G M Fried; A N Barkun; H H Sigman; E J Hinchey; J Garzon; M J Wexler; J L Meakins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct stones. The utility of planned perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy: experience with 63 patients.

Authors:  S M Graham; J L Flowers; T R Scott; R W Bailey; W A Scovill; K A Zucker; A L Imbembo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The evaluation and management of known or suspected stones of the common bile duct in the era of minimal access surgery.

Authors:  I M Leitman; M L Fisher; M J McKinley; R Rothman; R J Ward; D S Reiner; A J Tortolani
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993-06

9.  Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  J G Hunter
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  M E Arregui; C J Davis; A M Arkush; R F Nagan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  14 in total

1.  A balanced approach to choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  H Ramesh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Practical recommendations for the prediction and management of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones.

Authors:  N A Kama; M Atli; M Doganay; M Kologlu; E Reis; M Dolapci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

Authors:  S Varadarajulu; M A Eloubeidi; C M Wilcox; R H Hawes; P B Cotton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Prediction of which patients with an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram will have a confirmed stone at ERCP.

Authors:  Matthew P Spinn; David S Wolf; Dharmendra Verma; Frank J Lukens
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Suspected biliary complications after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy leading to endoscopic cholangiography: a retrospective comparison.

Authors:  C F Gholson; C Dungan; G Neff; R Ferguson; D Favrot; I Nandy; P Banish; K Sittig
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Common bile duct stones - their presentation, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Rajendra Desai; Bahaman N Shokouhi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  Effect of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy on outcome after gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  Robert S Bennion; Lance E Wyatt; Jesse E Thompson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  The role of intraoperative cholangiogram in the management of patients recovering from acute biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  H Shayan; D Kopac; C B Sample
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Biochemical predictors for absence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ming-Hsun Yang; Tien-Hua Chen; Shin-E Wang; Yi-Fang Tsai; Cheng-Hsi Su; Chew-Wun Wu; Wing-Yiu Lui; Yi-Ming Shyr
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Identifying patients most likely to have a common bile duct stone after a positive intraoperative cholangiogram.

Authors:  Raja Vadlamudi; Jason Conway; Girish Mishra; John Baillie; John Gilliam; Adolfo Fernandez; John Evans
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.