Literature DB >> 8328830

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct stones. The utility of planned perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy: experience with 63 patients.

S M Graham1, J L Flowers, T R Scott, R W Bailey, W A Scovill, K A Zucker, A L Imbembo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Planned perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and sphincterotomy (ES) for suspected or proven common bile duct stones (CBDS) has been attempted in 63 of 540 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Experience with this intervention has been studied with respect to accuracy, efficacy, and safety. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The optimal management of CBDSs in the era of LC is not defined. Methods exist for the laparoscopic manipulation of the common bile duct; however, experience is limited. Until surgeons become comfortable with this more demanding technique, ERC and ES will have a prominent role in the perioperative management of CBDSs.
METHODS: A preoperative group (n = 41) included all candidates for LC with historical, biochemical, or radiologic evidence of CBDSs. A postoperative LC group (n = 22) included patients with stones diagnosed by intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) (n = 6) or with signs or symptoms of retained, but unproven, CBDSs (n = 16).
RESULTS: Thirty-six (88%) of the preoperative attempts were successful. Stones were identified in 18 cases and ES and duct clearance were achieved in all 18. In the postoperative group, ERC was successful in 21 (95%) cases. Calculi were demonstrated in 5 of 6 patients with a positive IOC and 6 of 16 with clinically suspected retained stones. ES and duct clearance were achieved in all 11 patients with documented CBDSs. Overall, ERC was accomplished in 90% of cases. Stones were identified in 51% of cases and all stones were cleared by ES. Morbidity was confined to four cases of self-limited pancreatitis (6%). There were no deaths.
CONCLUSIONS: The perioperative management of CBDSs is an appealing approach for patients anticipating the benefits of LC, at least until the laparoscopic manipulation of the common bile duct becomes a more widely accepted technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8328830      PMCID: PMC1242901          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199307000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  41 in total

1.  [Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of vater and extraction of stones from the choledochal duct (author's transl)].

Authors:  M Classen; L Demling
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1974-03-15       Impact factor: 0.628

2.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater.

Authors:  K Kawai; Y Akasaka; K Murakami; M Tada; Y Koli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy in the management of gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  S van der Spuy
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Early or delayed endoscopic papillotomy (EPT) in gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  A R Rosseland; J H Solhaug
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Early and late complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for biliary lithiasis with and without the gall bladder 'in situ'.

Authors:  J Escourrou; J A Cordova; F Lazorthes; J Frexinos; A Ribet
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Present status and complications of EST in Japan.

Authors:  K Kawai; M Nakajima
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Is intravenous cholangiography still useful?

Authors:  M W Goodman; H J Ansel; J A Vennes; R B Lasser; S E Silvis
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal prior to cholecystectomy. A more cost-effective approach than operative duct exploration?

Authors:  G Van Stiegmann; N W Pearlman; J S Goff; J H Sun; L W Norton
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1989-07

9.  Non-operative removal of bile duct stones by duodenoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  A preliminary report: urgent duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  L Safrany; P B Cotton
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  21 in total

1.  Common bile duct stone characteristics: correlation with treatment choice during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R A Duensing; R A Williams; J C Collins; S E Wilson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  A balanced approach to choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  M C Lilly; M E Arregui
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Management of suspected stones in the common bile duct.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Jeffrey S Barkun; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Practical recommendations for the prediction and management of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones.

Authors:  N A Kama; M Atli; M Doganay; M Kologlu; E Reis; M Dolapci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Preoperative versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  L Chang; S Lo; B E Stabile; R J Lewis; K Toosie; C de Virgilio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Marc Zerey; Stephen Haggerty; William Richardson; Byron Santos; Robert Fanelli; L Michael Brunt; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and cholangiography in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  J Korman; J Cosgrove; M Furman; I Nathan; J Cohen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Factors predicting outcome after selective ERCP in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  G S Robertson; P R Johnson; B J Rathbone; A C Wicks; D M Lloyd; P S Veitch
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Laparoscopic choledochoscopy with a small-caliber endoscope. A safe and effective technique for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  W E Kelley; V C Sheridan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Effect of medical or surgical admission on outcome of patients with gallstone pancreatitis and common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Jennifer LaFemina; Suzanne M Sokal; Yuchiao Chang; Deborah McGrath; David L Berger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.