Literature DB >> 18000708

Biochemical predictors for absence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Ming-Hsun Yang1, Tien-Hua Chen, Shin-E Wang, Yi-Fang Tsai, Cheng-Hsi Su, Chew-Wun Wu, Wing-Yiu Lui, Yi-Ming Shyr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To provide optimal selection of patients for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or intraoperative cholangiography, we evaluated simple, noninvasive biochemical parameters as screening tests to predict the absence of common bile duct stones prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: A total of 1002 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Five biochemical parameters were measured preoperatively: gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase. Conventional diagnostic tests, including ultrasound imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, common bile duct diameter, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and serum amylase were performed. Along with the five biochemical tests above, these diagnostic tests were scrutinized and compared as potential predictors for common bile duct stones.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight (8.8%) patients with gallstone disease who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy had concurrent common bile duct stones. Among all diagnostic tests, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography had the highest sensitivity (96.0%), specificity (99.1%), probability ratio (107.3), accuracy (98.0%), and positive predictive value (98.8%) in detecting common bile duct stones. At least one abnormal elevation among the five biochemical parameters had the highest sensitivity (87.5%). Total bilirubin had the highest specificity (87.5%), highest probability ratio (3.9), highest accuracy (84.1%), and highest positive predictive value (27.4%). All five biochemical predictors had high negative predictive values; gamma glutamyl transferase was highest (97.9%), while the lowest was total bilirubin (94.7%). Multivariate analysis showed only gamma glutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin to be independent predictors; gamma glutamyl transferase appeared to be the most powerful predictor (odds ratio 3.20).
CONCLUSION: Biochemical tests, especially gamma glutamyl transferase with 97.9% negative predictive value, are ideal noninvasive predictors for the absence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We suggest that unnecessary, costly, or risky procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography can be omitted prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients without abnormal elevation of these biochemical values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18000708     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9665-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Practical recommendations for the prediction and management of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones.

Authors:  N A Kama; M Atli; M Doganay; M Kologlu; E Reis; M Dolapci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Appraisal of the management of bile duct stones.

Authors:  A G Johnson; S W Hosking
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Selective use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to facilitate laparoscopic cholecystectomy without cholangiography. A review of 1139 consecutive cases.

Authors:  R Coppola; M E Riccioni; S Ciletti; L Cosentino; V Ripetti; P Magistrelli; A Picciocchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  NIH Consensus conference. Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-02-24       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and preoperative bile duct stone removal in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  L Santucci; G Natalini; L Sarpi; S Fiorucci; A Solinas; A Morelli
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests.

Authors:  F Prat; B Meduri; B Ducot; R Chiche; R Salimbeni-Bartolini; G Pelletier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Routine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D G Clair; D L Carr-Locke; J M Becker; D C Brooks
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

8.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  C F Frey; E J Burbige; W B Meinke; T G Pullos; H N Wong; D M Hickman; J Belber
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction.

Authors:  Frances Tse; Jeffrey S Barkun; Joseph Romagnuolo; Gad Friedman; Jeffrey D Bornstein; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Predicting common bile duct lithiasis: determination and prospective validation of a model predicting low risk.

Authors:  R Houdart; T Perniceni; B Darne; M Salmeron; J F Simon
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  43 in total

1.  Dynamic analysis of commonly used biochemical parameters to predict common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Stéphane Bourgouin; Xavier Truchet; Gatien Lamblin; Jérôme De Roulhac; Jean-Philippe Platel; Paul Balandraud
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Surg Endosc 2008;22:1620-1624. Biochemical predictors of common bile duct (CBD) stones.

Authors:  Peter W Plaisier; René L van der Hul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Management of choledocholithiasis in an emergency cohort undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Benjamin Poh; Paul Cashin; Kaye Bowers; Travis Ackermann; Yeng Kwang Tay; Arun Dhir; Daniel Croagh
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Non-invasive assessment of choledocholithiasis in patients with gallstones and abnormal liver function.

Authors:  Bilal O Al-Jiffry; Abdeen Elfateh; Tariq Chundrigar; Bassem Othman; Owaid Almalki; Fares Rayza; Hashem Niyaz; Hesham Elmakhzangy; Mohammed Hatem
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The Value of Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-Pancreatography (MRCP) in the Detection of Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Ankur Mandelia; Arun Kumar Gupta; Devendra Kumar Verma; Sanjeev Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-09-10

6.  Re: Alanine transaminase rather than abdominal ultrasound alone is an important investigation to justify cholecystectomy in patients presenting with acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Yahya Al-Habbal; Philip Smart
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Surgery for common bile duct stones--a lost surgical skill; still worthwhile in the minimally invasive century?

Authors:  Harald Puhalla; Nathan Flint; Nicholas O'Rourke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis: From guidelines to clinical practice.

Authors:  Joana Magalhães; Bruno Rosa; José Cotter
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

9.  Impact of Jaundice on Outcomes Following Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Benjamin R Poh; Paul A Cashin; Daniel G Croagh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Clinical spotlight review for the management of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Vimal K Narula; Eleanor C Fung; D Wayne Overby; William Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.