Literature DB >> 8203985

Common bile duct evaluation in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 1050 cases later.

C R Voyles1, D L Sanders, R Hogan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors documented the evolution of common bile duct (CBD) evaluation after the development of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and CBD exploration. Emphasis was placed on stratification of CBD stone risk so that subgroups could be selected appropriately for no further studies, preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiogram (ERC), or intraoperative intervention.
METHODS: Data were accumulated by the authors on presentation, findings, and outcomes of 1050 patients who underwent cholecystectomies. Risk stratification was based on the history, ultrasound findings, biochemical derangements, and operative findings.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven per cent of patients met criteria to be "no/low" risk for CBD stones (CBD diameter < 5 mm, normal liver enzymes, and no history of acute cholecystitis, jaundice, or pancreatitis); in these patients, cholangiograms were not obtained, and there was no clinical evidence of CBD stones observed in follow-up at 45 months (sensitivity = 100%). As techniques developed for laparoscopic CBD exploration, there was a decreased incidence of open cholecystectomy (p < 0.05) and preoperative ERC (p < 0.05). The rate of operative cholangiogram increased from 13% to 23% during the series (p < 0.01). There were no CBD injuries or late strictures. The only bile leak occurred from a peripheral segmental duct in the gallbladder bed and was resolved with a laparotomy and suture. There were no transfusions. Three retained stones were documented in patients who had false-normal operative cholangiograms.
CONCLUSIONS: Criteria were defined that delineate a "no/low" risk group of LC patients for whom operative cholangiograms were not indicated for excluding CBD stones. The routine use of operative cholangiography as a means of preventing CBD injury was not substantiated by this study. The indications for preoperative ERC should continue to decrease as laparoscopic techniques evolve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8203985      PMCID: PMC1243236     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  23 in total

1.  Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology.

Authors:  J B Petelin
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-03

2.  Justification for routine cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  V J Bagnato; G E McGee; L E Hatten; J E Varner; J P Culpepper
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-06

3.  Gallstone migration as a cause of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  J M Acosta; C L Ledesma
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The laparoscopic buck stops here!

Authors:  C R Voyles
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Implications for common bile duct injury and retained common bile duct stones.

Authors:  J S Barkun; G M Fried; A N Barkun; H H Sigman; E J Hinchey; J Garzon; M J Wexler; J L Meakins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Laparoscopic transcystic duct balloon dilatation of the sphincter of Oddi.

Authors:  B J Carroll; E H Phillips; M Chandra; M Fallas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  More on ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S M Graham; J L Flowers
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis.

Authors:  S Sherman; G A Lehman
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  The evaluation and management of known or suspected stones of the common bile duct in the era of minimal access surgery.

Authors:  I M Leitman; M L Fisher; M J McKinley; R Rothman; R J Ward; D S Reiner; A J Tortolani
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993-06

10.  Spectrum and management of major complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A M Ress; M G Sarr; D M Nagorney; M B Farnell; J H Donohue; D C McIlrath
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  19 in total

1.  A comparison of intraoperative ultrasound versus cholangiography in the evaluation of the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J A Barteau; D Castro; M E Arregui; C Tetik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bile duct injury and the British and Irish surgeon.

Authors:  J Torkington; J Pereira; R T Chalmers; J Horner
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  The impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Authors:  H S Ho; K A Mathiesen; B M Wolfe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Hybrid fluorescent magnetic gastrojejunostomy: an experimental feasibility study in the porcine model and human cadaver.

Authors:  Ryohei Watanabe; Manuel Barberio; Shingo Kanaji; Alfonso Lapergola; Anila Hoskere Ashoka; Bohdan Andreiuk; Ludovica Guerriero; Margherita Pizzicannella; Barbara Seeliger; Yoshihisa Saida; Hironori Kaneko; Marc Worreth; Alend Saadi; Jacques Marescaux; Andrey S Klymchenko; Michele Diana
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Biliary leakage after urgent cholecystectomy: Optimization of endoscopic treatment.

Authors:  Neven Ljubičić; Alen Bišćanin; Tajana Pavić; Marko Nikolić; Ivan Budimir; August Mijić; Ana Đuzel
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-16

6.  Near-infrared cholecystocholangiography with direct intragallbladder indocyanine green injection: preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  Yu-Yin Liu; Chien-Hung Liao; Michele Diana; Shang-Yu Wang; Seong-Ho Kong; Chun-Nan Yeh; Bernard Dallemagne; Jacques Marescaux; Ta-Sen Yeh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Biliary tract complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are detected more frequently with routine intraoperative cholangiography.

Authors:  M S Woods; L W Traverso; R A Kozarek; J H Donohue; D R Fletcher; J G Hunter; M Oddsdottir; R L Rossi; J Tsao; J Windsor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and cholangiography in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  J Korman; J Cosgrove; M Furman; I Nathan; J Cohen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Factors predicting outcome after selective ERCP in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  G S Robertson; P R Johnson; B J Rathbone; A C Wicks; D M Lloyd; P S Veitch
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Management of bile duct stones at cholecystectomy: an Australian single-centre experience over 2 years.

Authors:  Kihoon Choi; Tehan Amarasena; Andrew Hughes; Ian Shaw; Harish Iswariah; Diana Tam; Robert Franz; Manju Chandrasegaram
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.