Literature DB >> 8573459

Psychological counseling strategies for women at risk of breast cancer.

K M Kash1, J C Holland, M P Osborne, D G Miller.   

Abstract

Women with family histories of breast cancer have a much higher risk of developing the disease than women in the general population. In the absence of primary prevention for breast cancer, secondary prevention in the form of early detection is our best bet against premature morbidity and mortality. This article describes the most salient psychological issues for high-risk women as well as ways for improving screening behaviors. Based on our work and other studies in the literature, we found that there were several key variables related to psychological distress and surveillance behaviors. Barriers to screening were a major reason why women did not engage in any breast cancer prevention behaviors. Cognitive deficits, in terms of lack of knowledge, and breast cancer misbeliefs contributed to poor adherence to screening. Most important, anxiety or emotional distress not only interfered with adherence to screening but also affected quality of life negatively in that many women needed psychological counseling. In developing psychological counseling strategies for high-risk women, we focused on the treatment outcomes of reducing emotional distress, decreasing perceived vulnerability, and improving adherence to screening behaviors. We conducted a preliminary study by piloting a group psychoeducational intervention for 6 consecutive weeks. This intervention was found to significantly reduce perception of risk (P < .02) and to increase adherence to screening behaviors (P < .01). If proven effective in a randomized controlled trial, this intervention can be proposed to other cancer centers and prevention programs for implementation and enhancement of the behaviors among high-risk women that will assure early detection and decrease breast cancer mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8573459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  18 in total

1.  Are family-oriented interventions in Portuguese genetics services a remote possibility? Professionals' views on a multifamily intervention for cancer susceptibility families.

Authors:  Alvaro Mendes; Milena Paneque; Liliana Sousa
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-02-08

2.  Addressing women's breast cancer risk and perceptions of control in medical settings.

Authors:  R Royak-Schaler; B Cheuvront; K R Wilson; C M Williams
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  1996-09

3.  A descriptive study of breast cancer worry.

Authors:  K D McCaul; A D Branstetter; S M O'Donnell; K Jacobson; K B Quinlan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1998-12

4.  Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management for Healthy Women at Risk for Breast Cancer: a Novel Application of a Proven Intervention.

Authors:  Bonnie A McGregor; Emily D Dolan; Karly M Murphy; Timothy S Sannes; Krista B Highland; Denise L Albano; Alison A Ward; Anna M Charbonneau; Mary W Redman; Rachel M Ceballos
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2015-12

5.  Who Is at Risk for Psychological Distress in Genetic Testing Programs for Hereditary Cancer Disorders?

Authors:  F J Grosfeld; C J Lips; F A Beemer; H F Ten Kroode
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  The Unmet Information and Support Needs of Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer: A Descriptive Survey.

Authors:  Belinda Thewes; Bettina Meiser; Monica Tucker; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Preserving the self: the process of decision making about hereditary breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  A Fuchsia Howard; Lynda G Balneaves; Joan L Bottorff; Patricia Rodney
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-10-27

Review 8.  Hereditary breast cancer. Psychosocial issues and family physicians' role.

Authors:  J C Carroll; R E Heisey; E Warner; V Goel; D R McCready
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Subjective versus objective risk in genetic counseling for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Anita Caruso; Cristina Vigna; Bruna Marozzo; Fabio M Sega; Isabella Sperduti; Francesco Cognetti; Antonella Savarese
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-21

10.  Predictors of pessimistic breast cancer risk perceptions in a primary care population.

Authors:  Susan L Davids; Marilyn M Schapira; Timothy L McAuliffe; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.