Literature DB >> 15061739

Predictors of pessimistic breast cancer risk perceptions in a primary care population.

Susan L Davids1, Marilyn M Schapira, Timothy L McAuliffe, Ann B Nattinger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify sociodemographic characteristics, numeracy level, and breast cancer risk factors that are independently associated with the accuracy of lifetime and 5-year breast cancer risk perceptions.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. A probability scale was used to measure lifetime and 5-year risk perceptions. The absolute difference between perceived risk and the Gail model risk of breast cancer was calculated. Linear regression models were built to predict lifetime and 5-year breast cancer risk estimation error.
SETTING: Primary care internal medicine practices (N = 2). PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-four women 40 to 85 years of age.
RESULTS: The mean lifetime and 5-year calculated breast cancer risk was 8.4% (SD [standard deviation] 6.1) and 1.5% (SD 1.3), respectively. Subjects had a mean estimation error for lifetime and 5-year risk of 29.5% (SD 22.9) and 24.8% (SD 23.9), respectively. In multivariate analyses, lower numeracy scores (0.005), higher number of previous breast biopsies (0.016), and a higher number of first-degree relatives (0.054) were predictive of larger estimation error for lifetime breast cancer risk. White race (0.014), lower educational levels (0.009), higher number of previous breast biopsies (0.008), and higher number of first-degree relatives (0.014) were predictive of larger estimation error for 5-year risk.
CONCLUSION: Among a primary care population, breast cancer risk factors may be more consistently associated with pessimistic perceptions of breast cancer risk than other factors studied during a lifetime and 5-year time span. Primary care physicians should consider counseling patients about individual breast cancer risk factors and risk over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15061739      PMCID: PMC1492192          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.20801.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  20 in total

1.  Scales for assessing perceptions of health hazard susceptibility.

Authors:  M A Diefenbach; N D Weinstein; J O'Reilly
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  1993-06

2.  Mammography and age: are we targeting the wrong women? A community survey of women and physicians.

Authors:  R P Harris; S W Fletcher; J J Gonzalez; D R Lannin; D Degnan; J A Earp; R Clark
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; G Samsa; B K Rimer
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  A new scale for assessing perceptions of chance: a validation study.

Authors:  S Woloshin; L M Schwartz; S Byram; B Fischhoff; H G Welch
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Relationships among breast cancer perceived absolute risk, comparative risk, and worries.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; M Kuchibhatla; C M McBride; H B Bosworth; K I Pollak; I C Siegler; B K Rimer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Psychological counseling strategies for women at risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  K M Kash; J C Holland; M P Osborne; D G Miller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1995

8.  Graphs to estimate an individualized risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Benichou; M H Gail; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  C Lerman; M Daly; C Sands; A Balshem; E Lustbader; T Heggan; L Goldstein; J James; P Engstrom
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-07-07       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age.

Authors:  W C Black; R F Nease; A N Tosteson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-05-17       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  33 in total

1.  Effect of various risk/benefit trade-offs on parents' understanding of a pediatric research study.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin; Terri Voepel-Lewis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Leading the way in breast cancer screening and prevention.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Low numeracy predicts reduced accuracy of retrospective reports of frequency of sexual behavior.

Authors:  Timothy L McAuliffe; Wayne DiFranceisco; Barbara R Reed
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2010-12

4.  Validation of a Short, 3-Item Version of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.

Authors:  Candace D McNaughton; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Sunil Kripalani; Russell L Rothman; Kenneth A Wallston
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Effect of arrangement of stick figures on estimates of proportion in risk graphics.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Elke U Weber; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Black-white differences in risk perceptions of breast cancer survival and screening mammography benefit.

Authors:  David A Haggstrom; Marilyn M Schapira
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Development and Validation of the Spanish Numeracy Understanding in Medicine Instrument.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Jacobs; Cindy M Walker; Tamara Miller; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Pamela S Ganschow; Diana Imbert; Maria O'Connell; Joan M Neuner; Marilyn M Schapira
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Using the Short Graph Literacy Scale to Predict Precursors of Health Behavior Change.

Authors:  Yasmina Okan; Eva Janssen; Mirta Galesic; Erika A Waters
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 9.  How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Wendy L Nelson; Paul K Han; Nathan F Dieckmann
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Communicating Numerical Risk: Human Factors That Aid Understanding in Health Care.

Authors:  Priscila G Brust-Renck; Caisa E Royer; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Rev Hum Factors Ergon       Date:  2013-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.