Literature DB >> 26141320

Who Is at Risk for Psychological Distress in Genetic Testing Programs for Hereditary Cancer Disorders?

F J Grosfeld1, C J Lips, F A Beemer, H F Ten Kroode.   

Abstract

Presymptomatic identification of disease gene carriers is becoming an increasingly common part of the clinical management of hereditary cancer disorders. With an expected increase in the number of requests for DNA testing and the limited resources for counseling, the amount of time genetic counselors are able to spend with test candidates will decrease. It is therefore important for counselors to identify persons at risk for psychological distress. Based on a review of experiences with Huntington disease and cancer patients, we describe factors likely to evoke distress in genetic cancer candidates. We also discuss the sometimes widely different ways that test candidates and their partners respond to genetic testing. By exploring risk factors for distress in relevant domains of the research, we can offer counselors guidelines for determining who may need extra counseling.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 26141320     DOI: 10.1023/A:1009468005966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  65 in total

1.  Needs and responses of parents following the diagnosis of childhood cancer.

Authors:  P Sloper
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.508

2.  Adjustment of gynecological and breast cancer patients to the cancer diagnosis: comparisons with males and females having other cancer sites.

Authors:  N V Sneed; B Edlund; J K Dias
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  1992 Jan-Mar

3.  Correlates of psychologic distress in colorectal cancer patients undergoing genetic testing for hereditary colon cancer.

Authors:  S W Vernon; E R Gritz; S K Peterson; C I Amos; C A Perz; W F Baile; P M Lynch
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 4.  Psychosocial and sexual implications of genitourinary cancers.

Authors:  U S Ofman
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.315

5.  Coping disposition, perceived risk, and psychological distress among women at increased risk for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M D Schwartz; C Lerman; S M Miller; M Daly; A Masny
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Predictive testing for Huntington disease in Canada: adverse effects and unexpected results in those receiving a decreased risk.

Authors:  M Huggins; M Bloch; S Wiggins; S Adam; O Suchowersky; M Trew; M Klimek; C R Greenberg; M Eleff; L P Thompson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1992-02-15

7.  A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: interacting effects of counseling, educational level, and coping style.

Authors:  C Lerman; M D Schwartz; S M Miller; M Daly; C Sands; B K Rimer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Parents' responses to predictive genetic testing in their children: report of a single case study.

Authors:  S Michie; V McDonald; M Bobrow; C McKeown; T Marteau
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling.

Authors:  S Lloyd; M Watson; B Waites; L Meyer; R Eeles; S Ebbs; A Tylee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  D G Evans; V Blair; R Greenhalgh; P Hopwood; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  A micro costing of NHS cancer genetic services.

Authors:  G L Griffith; R Tudor-Edwards; J Gray; R Butler; C Wilkinson; J Turner; B France; P Bennett
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-01-17       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Do Attachment Style and Emotion Regulation Strategies Indicate Distress in Predictive Testing?

Authors:  Lucienne B van der Meer; Erik van Duijn; Erik J Giltay; Aad Tibben
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Cancer Predisposition Genes in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs): a Review Paper from the Italian AYA Working Group.

Authors:  Angela Toss; Paola Quarello; Fedro Alessandro Peccatori; Andrea Ferrari; Maurizio Mascarin; Giuseppe Luigi Banna; Marco Zecca; Saverio Cinieri
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.945

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.