Literature DB >> 8568039

Encoding the fundamental frequency of a complex tone in the presence of a spectrally overlapping masker.

R P Carlyon1.   

Abstract

A series of experiments investigated listeners' ability to encode the fundamental frequency (F0) of a group of harmonics (the "target") in the presence of a second, spectrally overlapping, group (the "masker"). Experiment 1a was a sequential F0 discrimination task between two targets, whose F0s were geometrically centered on 210 Hz, in the presence of a 210-Hz masker. The target and the masker were bandpass filtered identically, either from 20 to 1420 Hz ("low-frequency" condition) or from 3900 to 5400 Hz ("high-frequency" condition). In the low-frequency condition the masker affected performance only moderately, regardless of whether it was gated synchronously with, or was turned on 150 ms before and off 150 ms after, each 200-ms target. In the high-frequency condition, the synchronous masker also had a moderate effect, but the asynchronous masker reduced performance dramatically. Whatever the masker gating, listeners did not hear the combination of the masker and target in this region as a mixture of two complex tones, but experienced a unitary noiselike or "crackle" percept. Experiment 1b showed that the large deterioration seen in the high-frequency condition of experiment 1a could be obtained in the low-frequency condition by reducing the F0 to 62.5 Hz, suggesting that the resolvability of adjacent harmonics was important for the effect. Experiment 2 required listeners to detect a difference in F0 ("delta F0") between two simultaneous groups of components, one filtered in the high region and the other in the low region. Performance was only slightly degraded by a continuous masker filtered in the low region, but was reduced to chance by a masker in the high region. Experiment 3 showed that, as the delta F0 between a masker and a target in the low region increased from 1% to 8%, listeners identified the mixture as sounding progressively "less fused," but this was not the case in the high region. It is concluded that listeners are poor at extracting the F0s of two groups of unresolved harmonics in the same frequency region. The experiments provide no evidence that listeners can use the leading part of an asynchronous masker to identify its F0 and thereby help extract the target's F0 from the mixture.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8568039     DOI: 10.1121/1.414510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

2.  Spectral processing of two concurrent harmonic complexes.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Pitch perception for mixtures of spectrally overlapping harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Musical intervals and relative pitch: frequency resolution, not interval resolution, is special.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Michael V Keebler; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to harmonic and mistuned complex tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Responses in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig to concurrent harmonic series and the effect of inactivation of descending controls.

Authors:  Kyle T Nakamoto; Trevor M Shackleton; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Pitch discrimination with mixtures of three concurrent harmonic complexes.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Fundamental-frequency discrimination based on temporal-envelope cues: Effects of bandwidth and interference.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-21

10.  Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.