Literature DB >> 8564796

Effect of femoral rotation on bone mineral density measurements with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

J C Goh1, S L Low, K Bose.   

Abstract

Precision in femoral neck scans with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is affected by variability in positioning and subsequent repositioning of the femur for repeated scans. To study the in vitro effect of femoral rotation on the bone mineral density (BMD), four fresh-frozen cadaveric femurs were fixed in a specially designed jig which allows for rotation of the femurs. BMD measurements of the femurs were done in neutral position (0 degrees) i.e., with the femoral neck axis parallel to the surface of the couch and at 15 degrees, 30 degrees, and 45 degrees of internal and external rotation. In vivo precision of the femoral neck scan was determined in five normal male subjects. The scans were first done with the legs positioned using the manufacturer's foot block. Five scans were performed, with repositioning, on the left hip of each subject. The procedure was then repeated with the legs positioned using a custom-designed positioning jig to minimize the rotation of the hips during a scan. In the in vitro study, the femoral neck BMD value was minimum at neutral position (0 degrees) and increased when the femur was rotated internally or externally. In vivo precision error of the femoral neck scan was reduced by almost 50% with the use of the positioning jig when compared with the manufacturer's foot block. Femoral rotation was shown to have a significant effect on BMD measurements, and proper positioning of the femur during a scan can improve precision significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8564796     DOI: 10.1007/bf00302069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  10 in total

1.  Determination of bone mineral density by dual x-ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B J Kiratli; J P Heiner; A A McBeath; M A Wilson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Effect of radiographic abnormalities on rate of bone loss from the spine.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; G E Dallal
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  The effect of positioning on dual energy X-ray bone densitometry of the proximal femur.

Authors:  C R Wilson; I Fogelman; G M Blake; A Rodin
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1991-04

4.  Longitudinal precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter study. The Nafarelin/Bone Study Group.

Authors:  E S Orwoll; S K Oviatt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry for bone densitometry: current status and perspective.

Authors:  D J Sartoris; D Resnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  A comparison of dual energy radiography measurements at the lumbar spine and proximal femur for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  M G Griffin; R C Rupich; L V Avioli; R Pacifici
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  The impact of osteophytic and vascular calcifications on vertebral mineral density measurements in men.

Authors:  E S Orwoll; S K Oviatt; T Mann
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Dual energy radiography (DER): a preliminary comparative study.

Authors:  R Pacifici; R Rupich; I Vered; K C Fischer; M Griffin; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Dual X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of bone density from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty: analysis protocols and reproducibility.

Authors:  C Trevisan; M Bigoni; R Cherubini; P Steiger; G Randelli; S Ortolani
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Performance evaluation of a dual-energy x-ray bone densitometer.

Authors:  R Mazess; B Collick; J Trempe; H Barden; J Hanson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.333

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): a method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device.

Authors:  S Kolta; A Le Bras; D Mitton; V Bousson; J A de Guise; J Fechtenbaum; J D Laredo; C Roux; W Skalli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry underestimates in vivo lumbar spine bone mineral density in overweight rats.

Authors:  Rim Cherif; Laurence Vico; Norbert Laroche; Mohsen Sakly; Nebil Attia; Cedric Lavet
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  The Effect of Region of Interest on Measurement of Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur: Simulation Analysis Using CT Images.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Masaki Takao; Yoshito Otake; Makoto Iwasa; Hidetoshi Hamada; Wataru Ando; Yoshinobu Sato; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Bone mineral density of the femoral neck in resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeannette Østergaard Penny; Ole Ovesen; Kim Brixen; Jens-Erik Varmarken; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Differences in hip bone mineral density may explain the hip fracture pattern in osteoarthritic hips.

Authors:  Olof Wolf; Håkan Ström; Jan Milbrink; Sune Larsson; Hans Mallmin
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Periprosthetic mineralization changes around femoral stems: a prospective 12-month study with DEXA.

Authors:  Marco Galli; Antonio Leone; Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli; Tommaso Pirronti; Angelo Gabriele Aulisa
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  DXA-based hip structural analysis of once-weekly bisphosphonate-treated postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

Authors:  S L Bonnick; T J Beck; F Cosman; M C Hochberg; H Wang; A E de Papp
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Effect of fat on measurement of bone mineral density.

Authors:  F Javed; W Yu; J Thornton; E Colt
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2009-07-01

9.  Temperature influence on DXA measurements: bone mineral density acquisition in frozen and thawed human femora.

Authors:  Dirk Wähnert; Konrad L Hoffmeier; Gabriele Lehmann; Rosemarie Fröber; Gunther O Hofmann; Thomas Mückley
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.