Literature DB >> 35902385

The Effect of Region of Interest on Measurement of Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur: Simulation Analysis Using CT Images.

Keisuke Uemura1,2, Masaki Takao3, Yoshito Otake4, Makoto Iwasa3, Hidetoshi Hamada3, Wataru Ando5, Yoshinobu Sato4, Nobuhiko Sugano5.   

Abstract

While accurate measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) is essential in the diagnosis of osteoporosis and in evaluating the treatment of osteoporosis, it is unclear how region of interest (ROI) settings affect measurement of BMD at the total proximal femur region. In this study, we performed a simulation analysis to clarify the effect on BMD measurement of changing the ROI using hip computed tomography (CT) images of 75 females (mean age, 62.4 years). Digitally reconstructed radiographs of the proximal femur region were generated from CT images to calculate the change in BMD when the proximal boundary of the ROI was altered by 0-10 mm, and when the distal boundary of the ROI was altered by 0-30 mm. Further, changes in BMD were compared across BMD classification groups. A mean BMD increase of 0.62% was found for each 1-mm extension of the distal boundary. A mean BMD decrease of 0.18% was found for each 1-mm alteration of the proximal boundary. Comparing BMD classification groups, patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia demonstrated greater BMD changes than patients with normal BMD for the distal boundary (0.68%, 0.64%, and 0.54%, respectively) and patients with osteoporosis demonstrated greater BMD changes than patients with osteoporosis and normal BMD for the proximal boundary (0.37%, 0.13%, and 0.03%, respectively). In conclusion, our study found that a consistent ROI setting, especially on the distal boundary, is necessary for the accurate measurement of total proximal femur BMD. Based on the findings, we recommend confirming that the ROI setting shown on the BMD result form is consistent with changes in serial BMD.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density (BMD); Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); Hip; Quantitative CT (QCT); Region of interest

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35902385     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-022-01012-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.000


  25 in total

Review 1.  Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry.

Authors:  Rajesh K Jain; Tamara Vokes
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Quality in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans.

Authors:  Sarah L Morgan; Ginnie L Prater
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Effect of Positioning of the Region of Interest on Bone Density of the Hip.

Authors:  Avery Feit; Natan Levin; Elizabeth A McNamara; Partha Sinha; LaTarsha G Whittaker; Alan O Malabanan; Harold N Rosen
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; C Cooper; R Rizzoli; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Best Practices for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurement and Reporting: International Society for Clinical Densitometry Guidance.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Neil Binkley; Sarah L Morgan; Christopher R Shuhart; Bruno Muzzi Camargos; John J Carey; Catherine M Gordon; Lawrence G Jankowski; Joon-Kiong Lee; William D Leslie
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2012 revision.

Authors:  Satoshi Soen; Masao Fukunaga; Toshitsugu Sugimoto; Teruki Sone; Saeko Fujiwara; Naoto Endo; Itsuo Gorai; Masataka Shiraki; Hiroshi Hagino; Takayuki Hosoi; Hiroaki Ohta; Toshiyuki Yoneda; Tatsushi Tomomitsu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Short-term reproducibility of proximal femur bone mineral density in the elderly.

Authors:  D Maggio; E V McCloskey; L Camilli; S Cenci; A Cherubini; J A Kanis; U Senin
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Effect of femoral rotation on bone mineral density measurements with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J C Goh; S L Low; K Bose
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Effect of leg rotation on hip bone mineral density measurements.

Authors:  Sarath Lekamwasam; Robolge Sumith Janaka Lenora
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.