Literature DB >> 2493329

Performance evaluation of a dual-energy x-ray bone densitometer.

R Mazess1, B Collick, J Trempe, H Barden, J Hanson.   

Abstract

We tested a dual-energy bone densitometer (LUNAR DPX) that uses a stable x-ray generator and a K-edge filter to achieve the two energy levels. A conventional scintillation detector in pulse-counting mode was used together with a gain stabilizer. The densitometer normally performs spine and femur scans in about 6 minutes and 3 minutes, respectively, with adequate spatial resolution (1.2 x 1.2 mm). Total body scans take either 10 minutes or 20 minutes. The long-term (6 months, n = 195) precision of repeat measurement on an 18-cm thick spine phantom was 0.6% at the medium speed. Precision error in vivo was about 0.6, 0.9 and 1.5% for spine scans (L2-L4) at slow, medium and fast speeds, while the error was 1.2 and 1.5 to 2.0%, respectively, for femur scans at slow and medium speed. The precision of total body bone density was 0.5% in vitro and in vivo. The response to increasing amounts of calcium hydroxyapatite was linear (r = 0.99). The densitometer accurately indicated (within 1%) the actual amount of hydroxyapatite after correction for physiological amounts of marrow fat. The measured area corresponded exactly (within 0.5%) to that of known annuli and to the radiographic area of spine phantoms. There was no significant effect of tissue thickness on mass, area, or areal density (BMD) between 10 and 24 cm of water. The BMD values for both spine and femur in vivo correlated highly (r = 0.98, SEE = .03 g/cm2) with those obtained using conventional 153Gd DPA. Similarly, total body BMD correlated highly (r = 0.96, SEE = .02 g/cm2) with DPA results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2493329     DOI: 10.1007/bf02556569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  10 in total

1.  X-RAY SPECTROPHOTOMETRY IN VIVO.

Authors:  B JACOBSON
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1964-01

2.  Vertebral mineral determination by quantitative computed tomography (QCT): accuracy of single and dual energy measurements.

Authors:  C C Glüer; U J Reiser; C A Davis; B K Rutt; H K Genant
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  X ray spectrophotometry for bone-mineral determinations.

Authors:  L Gustafsson; B Jacobson; L Kusoffsky
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1974-01

4.  Vertebral trabecular bone: comparison of single and dual-energy CT measurements with chemical analysis.

Authors:  A E Burgess; B Colborne; E Zoffmann
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Systematic errors in bone-mineral measurements by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  G U Rao; I Yaghmai; A O Wist; G Arora
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Dual energy radiography (DER): a preliminary comparative study.

Authors:  R Pacifici; R Rupich; I Vered; K C Fischer; M Griffin; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Dual-photon Gd-153 absorptiometry of bone.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; M Towsley; R Lindsay; L Markhard; D Dempster
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  T L Kelly; D M Slovik; D A Schoenfeld; R M Neer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Evaluation of a prototype dual-energy computed tomographic apparatus. II. Determination of vertebral bone mineral content.

Authors:  J R Vetter; W H Perman; W A Kalender; R B Mazess; J E Holden
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Influence of vertebral fat content on quantitative CT density.

Authors:  A M Laval-Jeantet; B Roger; S Bouysee; C Bergot; R B Mazess
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 11.105

  10 in total
  67 in total

1.  One year prospective open study of the effect of high dose inhaled steroids, fluticasone propionate, and budesonide on bone markers and bone mineral density.

Authors:  J A Hughes; B G Conry; S M Male; R Eastell
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Enhanced precision with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  R Mazess; C H Chesnut; M McClung; H Genant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur by two commercially available dual energy X-ray absorptiometric systems.

Authors:  O L Svendsen; U Marslew; C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1992

4.  Comparative study of the performances of X-ray and gadolinium 153 bone densitometers at the level of the spine, femoral neck and femoral shaft.

Authors:  D O Slosman; R Rizzoli; B Buchs; F Piana; A Donath; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

5.  Ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus: a sensitive and specific discriminator of osteopenia in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Agren; A Karellas; D Leahey; S Marks; D Baran
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Ultrasound velocity changes at the proximal phalanxes of the hand in pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  V Ventura; M Mauloni; M Mura; F Paltrinieri; D de Aloysio
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal women: a cross-sectional study of 717 Finnish volunteers.

Authors:  H Kröger; J Heikkinen; K Laitinen; A Kotaniemi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  B Lees; J C Stevenson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Automated registration of hip and spine for longitudinal QCT studies: integration with 3D densitometric and structural analysis.

Authors:  Wenjun Li; Miki Sode; Isra Saeed; Thomas Lang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement--comparison of a single-beam and fan-beam design: the effect of osteophytic calcification on spine bone mineral density.

Authors:  H Franck; M Munz; M Scherrer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.