Literature DB >> 8523909

Effects of electrode geometry and combination on nerve fibre selectivity in spinal cord stimulation.

J Holsheimer1, J J Struijk, N R Tas.   

Abstract

The differential effects of the geometry of a rostrocaudal array of electrode contacts on dorsal column fibre and dorsal root fibre activation in spinal cord stimulation are analysed theoretically. 3-D models of the mid-cervical and mid-thoracic vertebral areas are used for the computation of stimulation induced field potentials, whereas a cable model of myelinated nerve fibre is used for the calculation of the excitation thresholds of large dorsal column and dorsal root fibres. The size and spacing of 2-D rectangular electrode contacts are varied while mono-, bi- and tripolar stimulation are applied. The model predicts that the highest preferential stimulation of dorsal root fibres is obtained in monopolar stimulation with a large cathode, whereas dorsal column fibre preference is highest in tripolar stimulation with small contacts and small contact spacings. Fibre type preference is most sensitive to variations of rostrocaudal contact size and least sensitive to variations of lateral contact size. Dorsal root fibre preference is increased and sensitivity to lead geometry is reduced as the distance from contacts to spinal cord is increased.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8523909     DOI: 10.1007/bf02510785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  23 in total

1.  Recruitment of dorsal column fibers in spinal cord stimulation: influence of collateral branching.

Authors:  J J Struijk; J Holsheimer; G G van der Heide; H B Boom
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  How do geometric factors influence epidural spinal cord stimulation? A quantitative analysis by computer modeling.

Authors:  J Holsheimer; J J Struijk
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  Multifactorial analysis of epidural spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  G Barolat; S Zeme; B Ketcik
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 4.  Pain mechanisms: a new theory.

Authors:  R Melzack; P D Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Targeting a spinal stimulator to treat the 'failed back surgery syndrome'.

Authors:  J D Law
Journal:  Appl Neurophysiol       Date:  1987

6.  Excitation of dorsal root fibers in spinal cord stimulation: a theoretical study.

Authors:  J J Struijk; J Holsheimer; H B Boom
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Analysis of parameters for epidural spinal cord stimulation. 1. Perception and tolerance thresholds resulting from 1,100 combinations.

Authors:  M Tulgar; G Barolat; B Ketcik
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.875

8.  Spinal stimulation: statistical superiority of monophasic stimulation of narrowly separated, longitudinal bipoles having rostral cathodes.

Authors:  J D Law
Journal:  Appl Neurophysiol       Date:  1983

9.  Importance and documentation of an epidural stimulating position.

Authors:  J D Law; L V Miller
Journal:  Appl Neurophysiol       Date:  1982

10.  Mapping of sensory responses to epidural stimulation of the intraspinal neural structures in man.

Authors:  G Barolat; F Massaro; J He; S Zeme; B Ketcik
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  11 in total

1.  Spinal Cord Stimulation: Indications, Mechanism of Action, and Efficacy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  1999

2.  Optimum electrode geometry for spinal cord stimulation: the narrow bipole and tripole.

Authors:  J Holsheimer; W A Wesselink
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Transverse tripolar spinal cord stimulation: theoretical performance of a dual channel system.

Authors:  J J Struijk; J Holsheimer
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Dorsal column steerability with dual parallel leads using dedicated power sources: a computational model.

Authors:  Dongchul Lee; Ewan Gillespie; Kerry Bradley
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 5.  Spinal cord stimulation programming: a crash course.

Authors:  Breanna Sheldon; Michael D Staudt; Lucian Williams; Tessa A Harland; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 6.  Model-based analysis and design of waveforms for efficient neural stimulation.

Authors:  Warren M Grill
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Neural Recruitment During Conventional, Burst, and 10-kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain.

Authors:  Evan R Rogers; Hans J Zander; Scott F Lempka
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 5.820

8.  Predicted effects of pulse width programming in spinal cord stimulation: a mathematical modeling study.

Authors:  Dongchul Lee; Brad Hershey; Kerry Bradley; Thomas Yearwood
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Spinal cord stimulation: the clinical application of new technology.

Authors:  Dominic Hegarty
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-10-05

10.  Model-Based Optimization of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Inspiratory Muscle Activation.

Authors:  Hans J Zander; Krzysztof E Kowalski; Anthony F DiMarco; Scott F Lempka
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.