Literature DB >> 1947505

Multifactorial analysis of epidural spinal cord stimulation.

G Barolat1, S Zeme, B Ketcik.   

Abstract

In order to provide a data bank to allow a more precise and effective implementation of spinal cord stimulation, a computerized analysis of 1,375 combinations obtained from electrode arrays located in the thoracic and cervical epidural area was performed. 67 electrode arrays implanted in 34 subjects were subjected to analysis. During the stimulation trial, all the available combinations were systematically tested and the results entered into a computerized database. The study was not meant to analyze the clinical results or the indications of epidural spinal cord stimulation. Parameters studied include position of each electrical contact as related to midline, vertebral level of each contact, distribution of stimulation-induced paresthesiae, and electrical parameters (voltage, rate, pulse width, perception threshold, discomfort threshold, usage range). Analysis of the data allow the surgeon (1) to define the characteristics of the stimulation-induced paresthesiae; (2) to define the spectrum of the electrical parameters used to stimulate the spinal cord; (3) to define the population of implanted electrode arrays/contacts; (4) to study objectively how the position of the electrodes within the spinal canal, their vertebral level and the interelectrode distance affect the electrical parameters and the stimulation-induced responses. The multifactorial systematic analysis of such a large number of combinations provides the basis for further developments in the area of electrical stimulation of the nervous system.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1947505     DOI: 10.1159/000099395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg        ISSN: 1011-6125            Impact factor:   1.875


  10 in total

1.  Optimum electrode geometry for spinal cord stimulation: the narrow bipole and tripole.

Authors:  J Holsheimer; W A Wesselink
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Transverse tripolar spinal cord stimulation: theoretical performance of a dual channel system.

Authors:  J J Struijk; J Holsheimer
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Principles of electrical stimulation and dorsal column mapping as it relates to spinal cord stimulation: an overview.

Authors:  Chitra Ramasubbu; Artemus Flagg; Kayode Williams
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-02

4.  Modeling the interactions between stimulation and physiologically induced APs in a mammalian nerve fiber: dependence on frequency and fiber diameter.

Authors:  Vijay Sadashivaiah; Pierre Sacré; Yun Guan; William S Anderson; Sridevi V Sarma
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Effects of electrode geometry and combination on nerve fibre selectivity in spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  J Holsheimer; J J Struijk; N R Tas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Spinal cord stimulation as a treatment for refractory neuropathic pain in tethered cord syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Maarten Moens; Ann De Smedt; Jan D'Haese; Steven Droogmans; Cristo Chaskis
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2010-02-25

7.  Spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Leveque; Alan T Villavicencio; Ketan R Bulsara; Linda Rubin; John P Gorecki
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2001-01

Review 8.  Closed-loop neurostimulation: the clinical experience.

Authors:  Felice T Sun; Martha J Morrell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 9.  Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: current perspectives.

Authors:  Tilman Wolter
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Evaluation of intradural stimulation efficiency and selectivity in a computational model of spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Shivanand P Lad; Warren M Grill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.