Literature DB >> 6608317

Spinal stimulation: statistical superiority of monophasic stimulation of narrowly separated, longitudinal bipoles having rostral cathodes.

J D Law.   

Abstract

A prospective study of a large number of spinal stimulating electrodes permitted a statistical comparison of stimulus parameters, including phase, polarity and orientation of bipolar electrodes. For the treatment of pain, the technical grade of a stimulator is proportional to the range of stimulation, which was found to be significantly greater under the conditions listed in the title.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6608317     DOI: 10.1159/000101252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Neurophysiol


  4 in total

1.  Spinal Cord Stimulation: Indications, Mechanism of Action, and Efficacy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  1999

2.  Optimum electrode geometry for spinal cord stimulation: the narrow bipole and tripole.

Authors:  J Holsheimer; W A Wesselink
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Transverse tripolar spinal cord stimulation: theoretical performance of a dual channel system.

Authors:  J J Struijk; J Holsheimer
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Effects of electrode geometry and combination on nerve fibre selectivity in spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  J Holsheimer; J J Struijk; N R Tas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.602

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.