Literature DB >> 32291559

Spinal cord stimulation programming: a crash course.

Breanna Sheldon1, Michael D Staudt2, Lucian Williams1, Tessa A Harland2, Julie G Pilitsis3,4.   

Abstract

The aim of this comprehensive review is to provide an instructional guide for providers regarding the parameters and programming of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices. Knowing these fundamentals will aid in providing superior pain relief to patients. SCS has four programmable parameters: contact (electrode) selection, amplitude, pulse width, and frequency. Each parameter needs to be accounted for when assessing which program works for which patient. Traditional open-loop systems allow for different "programs," or combinations of these four parameters, to be pre-set by the provider and medical device representative. These allow for flexibility in the type of stimulation delivered to the patient depending on activity. Patients are also given control over programs and changing the amplitudes of these programs. However, some open-loop systems place the burden of toggling between programs to manage pain control on patients, though this tends to be less in subparesthesia programs. Newer closed-loop systems make it possible for stimulation settings to automatically adjust in response to accelerometry and evoked compound action potential feedback, and therefore have the potential to streamline the patient experience. This article provides practitioners with the basic knowledge of SCS parameters and programming systems. Understanding their use is essential to providing optimal pain relief to patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algorithm; Programming; Spinal cord stimulation; Systems; Waveforms

Year:  2020        PMID: 32291559     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01299-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  58 in total

1.  "Failed back surgery syndrome".

Authors:  Lina Talbot
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-25

2.  Alleviating suffering 101--pain relief in the United States.

Authors:  Philip A Pizzo; Noreen M Clark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally.

Authors:  Simon Dagenais; Jaime Caro; Scott Haldeman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 4.  Advanced waveforms and frequency with spinal cord stimulation: burst and high-frequency energy delivery.

Authors:  Jason E Pope; Steven Falowski; Tim R Deer
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.166

5.  High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Case Report.

Authors:  Joseph T Crapanzano; Lisa M Harrison-Bernard; Mark R Jones; Alan D Kaye; Erich O Richter; Mordeci N Potash
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Retrospective review of 707 cases of spinal cord stimulation: indications and complications.

Authors:  Nagy A Mekhail; Manu Mathews; Fady Nageeb; Maged Guirguis; Mark N Mekhail; Jianguo Cheng
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 7.  Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications.

Authors:  Judith A Turner; John D Loeser; Richard A Deyo; Stacy B Sanders
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 8.  Parameters of Spinal Cord Stimulation and Their Role in Electrical Charge Delivery: A Review.

Authors:  Jonathan P Miller; Sam Eldabe; Eric Buchser; Lisa M Johanek; Yun Guan; Bengt Linderoth
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2016-05-06

9.  Prevalence of Chronic Pain and High-Impact Chronic Pain Among Adults - United States, 2016.

Authors:  James Dahlhamer; Jacqueline Lucas; Carla Zelaya; Richard Nahin; Sean Mackey; Lynn DeBar; Robert Kerns; Michael Von Korff; Linda Porter; Charles Helmick
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  Mechanism of Action in Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation: Review and Recent Advances.

Authors:  Krishnan Chakravarthy; Michael A Fishman; Xander Zuidema; Corey W Hunter; Robert Levy
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.750

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Current Strategies for the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.

Authors:  Michael D Staudt; Tarun Prabhala; Breanna L Sheldon; Nicholas Quaranta; Michael Zakher; Ravneet Bhullar; Julie G Pilitsis; Charles E Argoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-28

2.  A New Direction for Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation: Combining Contemporary Therapy Paradigms with Evoked Compound Action Potential Sensing.

Authors:  Ricardo Vallejo; Krishnan Chakravarthy; Andrew Will; Karen Trutnau; David Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.832

3.  Changes in quantitative sensory testing and patient perspectives following spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndrome: An observational study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Yannick J G M Plantaz; Robert T M van Dongen; Richard L Witkam; Kris C P Vissers; Hans Timmerman
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.651

4.  The Evoked Compound Action Potential as a Predictor for Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: Tools for Automatic Spinal Cord Stimulator Programming and Control.

Authors:  Julie G Pilitsis; Krishnan V Chakravarthy; Andrew J Will; Karen C Trutnau; Kristin N Hageman; David A Dinsmoor; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.