Literature DB >> 9374053

Optimum electrode geometry for spinal cord stimulation: the narrow bipole and tripole.

J Holsheimer1, W A Wesselink.   

Abstract

A computer model is used to calculate the optimum geometry of an epidural electrode, consisting of a longitudinal contact array, for spinal cord stimulation in the management of chronic, intractable pain. 3D models of the spinal area are used for the computation of stimulation induced fields, and a cable model of myelinated nerve fibre is used for the calculation of the threshold stimulus to excite large dorsal column and dorsal root fibres. The criteria for the geometry of the longitudinal contact array are: a low threshold for the stimulation of dorsal column fibres compared with dorsal root fibres; and a low stimulation voltage (and current). For both percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes, the contact length should be approximately 1.5 mm, and the optimum contact separation, as determined by the computer model, is 2-2.5 mm. The contacts for a laminectomy electrode should be approximately 4 mm wide. This electrode geometry is applicable to all spinal levels where the dorsal columns can be stimulated (C1-2 down to L1). The stimulating electrode should preferably be used as a tripole with one (central) cathode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9374053     DOI: 10.1007/bf02525529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  19 in total

1.  Recruitment of dorsal column fibers in spinal cord stimulation: influence of collateral branching.

Authors:  J J Struijk; J Holsheimer; G G van der Heide; H B Boom
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  How do geometric factors influence epidural spinal cord stimulation? A quantitative analysis by computer modeling.

Authors:  J Holsheimer; J J Struijk
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  Multifactorial analysis of epidural spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  G Barolat; S Zeme; B Ketcik
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.875

4.  Effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in the management of chronic pain: analysis of technical drawbacks and solutions.

Authors:  J Holsheimer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 5.  Pain mechanisms: a new theory.

Authors:  R Melzack; P D Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Excitation of dorsal root fibers in spinal cord stimulation: a theoretical study.

Authors:  J J Struijk; J Holsheimer; H B Boom
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Analysis of parameters for epidural spinal cord stimulation. 1. Perception and tolerance thresholds resulting from 1,100 combinations.

Authors:  M Tulgar; G Barolat; B Ketcik
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.875

8.  Spinal stimulation: statistical superiority of monophasic stimulation of narrowly separated, longitudinal bipoles having rostral cathodes.

Authors:  J D Law
Journal:  Appl Neurophysiol       Date:  1983

9.  Segmental effects of epidural spinal cord stimulation in humans.

Authors:  J P Hunter; P Ashby
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Mapping of sensory responses to epidural stimulation of the intraspinal neural structures in man.

Authors:  G Barolat; F Massaro; J He; S Zeme; B Ketcik
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  20 in total

1.  Design, fabrication and evaluation of a conforming circumpolar peripheral nerve cuff electrode for acute experimental use.

Authors:  Emily L Foldes; D Michael Ackermann; Niloy Bhadra; Kevin L Kilgore; Narendra Bhadra
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Design and in vivo evaluation of more efficient and selective deep brain stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Brian Huynh; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 3.  Principles of electrical stimulation and dorsal column mapping as it relates to spinal cord stimulation: an overview.

Authors:  Chitra Ramasubbu; Artemus Flagg; Kayode Williams
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-02

4.  Dorsal column steerability with dual parallel leads using dedicated power sources: a computational model.

Authors:  Dongchul Lee; Ewan Gillespie; Kerry Bradley
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Effect of bipolar cuff electrode design on block thresholds in high-frequency electrical neural conduction block.

Authors:  D Michael Ackermann; Emily L Foldes; Niloy Bhadra; Kevin L Kilgore
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  The Quasi-uniform assumption for Spinal Cord Stimulation translational research.

Authors:  Niranjan Khadka; Dennis Q Truong; Preston Williams; John H Martin; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 7.  And yet it moves: Recovery of volitional control after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  G Taccola; D Sayenko; P Gad; Y Gerasimenko; V R Edgerton
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 11.685

8.  A model for transcutaneous current stimulation: simulations and experiments.

Authors:  Andreas Kuhn; Thierry Keller; Marc Lawrence; Manfred Morari
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Dorsal column stimulator applications.

Authors:  Claudio Yampolsky; Santiago Hem; Damián Bendersky
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-10-31

10.  Improved focalization of electrical microstimulation using microelectrode arrays: a modeling study.

Authors:  Sébastien Joucla; Blaise Yvert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.