Literature DB >> 8475280

Survey of reproductive health among female MR workers.

E Kanal1, J Gillen, J A Evans, D A Savitz, F G Shellock.   

Abstract

Epidemiologic data were obtained to evaluate potential risks from exposure to the static and time-varying magnetic fields used in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. A questionnaire sent to women workers in more than 90% of clinical MR facilities in the United States addressed menstrual-reproductive experiences, work activities, and potential confounders (eg, age, smoking, alcohol use). In 1,915 completed questionnaires, 1,421 pregnancies were reported: 280 occurred in an MR worker (technologist or nurse), 894 in an employee in another job, 54 in a student, and 193 in homemakers. Comparing MR-worker pregnancies with those occurring in employees at other jobs, a relative risk ratio of 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-1.77) was found for spontaneous abortions; for conception taking more than 12 months, 0.90 (CI, 0.54-1.51); for delivery before 39 weeks, 1.19 (CI, 0.76-1.88); for birth weight below 5.5 lb (2.5 kg), 1.01 (CI, 0.50-2.04); and for male gender of the offspring, 0.99 (CI, 0.80-1.22). Adjustment for maternal age, smoking, and alcohol use also failed to markedly change any of the associations. These results suggest that there is not a substantial increase in these common adverse reproductive outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8475280     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.187.2.8475280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

Review 1.  Acute pancreatitis in pregnancy.

Authors:  Capecomorin S Pitchumoni; Balaji Yegneswaran
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain.

Authors:  Shannon Tocchio; Beth Kline-Fath; Emanuel Kanal; Vincent J Schmithorst; Ashok Panigrahy
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 3.  Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in obstetric practice.

Authors:  Aydın Köşüş; Nermin Köşüş; Betül Usluoğulları; Müzeyyen Duran; Nilgün Öztürk Turhan; Mehmet Tekşam
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-03-01

Review 4.  Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: jumping from 1.5 to 3 tesla (preliminary experience).

Authors:  Teresa Victoria; Diego Jaramillo; Timothy Paul Leslie Roberts; Deborah Zarnow; Ann Michelle Johnson; Jorge Delgado; Erika Rubesova; Arastoo Vossough
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-03-27

5.  Birthweight of term infants and maternal occupation in a prospective cohort of pregnant women. The ALSPAC Study Team.

Authors:  A Farrow; K M Shea; R E Little
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Fast MR imaging of fetal CNS anomalies in utero.

Authors:  E M Simon; R B Goldstein; F V Coakley; R A Filly; K C Broderick; T J Musci; A J Barkovich
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  [New aspects from legislation, guidelines and safety standards for MRI].

Authors:  M Mühlenweg; G Schaefers; S Trattnig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 8.  Headache in pregnancy.

Authors:  Dawn A Marcus
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2003-08

9.  The usefulness of fetal MRI for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Yong-Seok Sohn; Myung-Joon Kim; Ja-Young Kwon; Young-Han Kim; Yong-Won Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Pictorial essay: MRI of the fetal brain.

Authors:  Ganesh Rao B; Bs Ramamurthy
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2009-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.