Literature DB >> 24671739

Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: jumping from 1.5 to 3 tesla (preliminary experience).

Teresa Victoria1, Diego Jaramillo, Timothy Paul Leslie Roberts, Deborah Zarnow, Ann Michelle Johnson, Jorge Delgado, Erika Rubesova, Arastoo Vossough.   

Abstract

Several attempts have been made at imaging the fetus at 3 T as part of the continuous search for increased image signal and better anatomical delineation of the developing fetus. Until very recently, imaging of the fetus at 3 T has been disappointing, with numerous artifacts impeding image analysis. Better magnets and coils and improved technology now allow imaging of the fetus at greater magnetic strength, some hurdles in the shape of imaging artifacts notwithstanding. In this paper we present the preliminary experience of evaluating the developing fetus at 3 T and discuss several artifacts encountered and techniques to decrease them, as well as safety concerns associated with scanning the fetus at higher magnetic strength.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671739     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-013-2857-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  31 in total

Review 1.  3.0 Tesla imaging of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Raymond Kuo; Mahendra Panchal; Larry Tanenbaum; John V Crues
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Three-dimensional MRI volumetric measurements of the normal fetal colon.

Authors:  Erika Rubesova; Chardonnay J Vance; Hans G Ringertz; Richard A Barth
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Value of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of postnatal outcome in fetuses with diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  J Jani; M Cannie; P Sonigo; Y Robert; O Moreno; A Benachi; P Vaast; E Gratacos; K H Nicolaides; J Deprest
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Numerical study of RF exposure and the resulting temperature rise in the foetus during a magnetic resonance procedure.

Authors:  J W Hand; Y Li; J V Hajnal
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Improvement in B1-inhomogeneity artifacts in the abdomen at 3T MR imaging using a radiofrequency cushion.

Authors:  Kendra M Franklin; Brian M Dale; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Body MR imaging at 3.0 T: understanding the opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Mara M Barth; Martin P Smith; Ivan Pedrosa; Robert E Lenkinski; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D D Stark; S M McCarthy; R A Filly; J T Parer; H Hricak; P W Callen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  NMR imaging in pregnancy.

Authors:  F W Smith; A H Adam; W D Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-01-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance.

Authors:  P N Baker; I R Johnson; P R Harvey; P A Gowland; P Mansfield
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Use of ultrasound and MRI for evaluation of lung volumes in fetuses with isolated left congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Teresa Victoria; Enrico Danzer; N Scott Adzick
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  28 in total

1.  Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: exposure times and functional outcomes at preschool age.

Authors:  Marine Bouyssi-Kobar; Adré J du Plessis; Richard L Robertson; Catherine Limperopoulos
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-07-09

Review 2.  MRI of the Fetal Brain.

Authors:  C Weisstanner; G Kasprian; G M Gruber; P C Brugger; D Prayer
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 3.  MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain.

Authors:  Shannon Tocchio; Beth Kline-Fath; Emanuel Kanal; Vincent J Schmithorst; Ashok Panigrahy
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 4.  Image-quality optimization and artifact reduction in fetal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fedel Machado-Rivas; Camilo Jaimes; John E Kirsch; Michael S Gee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-11-30

Review 5.  Fetal MRI at 3T-ready for routine use?

Authors:  Christian Weisstanner; Gerlinde M Gruber; Peter C Brugger; Christan Mitter; Mariana C Diogo; Gregor Kasprian; Daniela Prayer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  The prenatal diagnosis and classification of cleft palate: the role and value of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Weizeng Zheng; Baohua Li; Yu Zou; Fenlan Lou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The contribution of fetal MR imaging to the assessment of oesophageal atresia.

Authors:  V Hochart; P Verpillat; C Langlois; C Garabedian; J Bigot; V Houfflin Debarge; R Sfeir; F E Avni
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Functional Connectivity of the Human Brain in Utero.

Authors:  Marion I van den Heuvel; Moriah E Thomason
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Feasibility of whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for detection of primary tumour, nodal and distant metastases in women with cancer during pregnancy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Sileny N Han; Frédéric Amant; Katrijn Michielsen; Frederik De Keyzer; Steffen Fieuws; Kristel Van Calsteren; Raphaëla C Dresen; Mina Mhallem Gziri; Vincent Vandecaveye
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Fetal neuroimaging: an update on technical advances and clinical findings.

Authors:  Ashley J Robinson; M Ashraf Ederies
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.