Literature DB >> 11039352

Fast MR imaging of fetal CNS anomalies in utero.

E M Simon1, R B Goldstein, F V Coakley, R A Filly, K C Broderick, T J Musci, A J Barkovich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Although sonography is the primary imaging technique for evaluating the developing fetus, significant limitations exist in the sonographic prenatal diagnosis of many brain disorders. Fast MR imaging is increasingly being used to determine the underlying cause of nonspecific fetal CNS abnormalities detected sonographically and to confirm or provide further support for such anomalies. Our goal was to determine the value of MR imaging in establishing the diagnosis of fetal CNS anomalies, to ascertain how this information might be used for patient counseling, and to assess its impact on pregnancy management.
METHODS: We prospectively performed MR examinations of 73 fetuses (66 pregnancies) with suspected CNS abnormalities and compared these with available fetal sonograms, postnatal images, and clinical examinations. Retrospectively, the impact on patient counseling and pregnancy management was analyzed.
RESULTS: Images of diagnostic quality were routinely obtained with in utero MR imaging, which was particularly valuable in detecting heterotopia, callosal anomalies, and posterior fossa malformations, and for providing excellent anatomic information. We believe that 24 (46%) of 52 clinical cases were managed differently from the way they would have been on the basis of sonographic findings alone. In every case, the referring physicians thought that MR imaging provided a measure of confidence that was not previously available and that was valuable for counseling patients and for making more informed decisions.
CONCLUSION: Sonography is the leading technique for fetal assessment and provides reliable, inexpensive diagnostic images. Fast MR imaging is an important adjunctive tool for prenatal imaging in those instances in which a complex anomaly is suspected by sonography, when fetal surgery is contemplated, or when a definitive diagnosis cannot be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11039352      PMCID: PMC8174857     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  57 in total

Review 1.  Obstetric MR imaging.

Authors:  D Levine; P D Barnes; R R Edelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Fast-scan magnetic resonance imaging in fetal visualization.

Authors:  A S Garden; R D Griffiths; A M Weindling; P A Martin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Biological effects of weak electromagnetic fields from 0 Hz to 200 MHz: a survey of the literature with special emphasis on possible magnetic resonance effects.

Authors:  G J Beers
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 4.  [Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus. Contribution to antenatal diagnosis].

Authors:  C Garel; G Sebag; H Brisse; M Elmaleh; J F Oury; M Hassan
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1996-03-16       Impact factor: 1.228

Review 5.  Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging of fetal anomalies.

Authors:  A M Hubbard; P Harty
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 0.800

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus.

Authors:  C Garel; H Brisse; G Sebag; M Elmaleh; J F Oury; M Hassan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1998-04

7.  NMR imaging produces no observable mutations or cytotoxicity in mammalian cells.

Authors:  J L Schwartz; L E Crooks
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Myelomeningocele repair in utero: a report of three cases.

Authors:  N Tulipan; J P Bruner
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.162

9.  Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amniocenteses in the treatment of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

Authors:  K Hecher; H Plath; T Bregenzer; M Hansmann; B J Hackelöer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly: misidentification of the true medial boundary of the ventricle at US.

Authors:  B S Hertzberg; M A Kliewer; J D Bowie
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  42 in total

1.  Investigation of multichannel phased array performance for fetal MR imaging on 1.5T clinical MR system.

Authors:  Ye Li; Yong Pang; Daniel Vigneron; Orit Glenn; Duan Xu; Xiaoliang Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 2.  Surgery in the human fetus: the future.

Authors:  Alan W Flake
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-08-16       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Fetal MRI: techniques and protocols.

Authors:  Daniela Prayer; Peter Christian Brugger; Lucas Prayer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-07-28

Review 4.  MRI of the fetal spine.

Authors:  Erin M Simon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-07-28

5.  High-resolution in utero 3D MR imaging of inner ear microstructures in fetal sheep.

Authors:  J-H Buhk; M Frisch; J Yamamura; J Graessner; G Adam; U Wedegärtner
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  The use of in utero MR imaging to delineate developmental brain abnormalities in multifetal pregnancies.

Authors:  P D Griffiths; S A Russell; G Mason; J Morris; E Fanou; M J Reeves
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  The use of in utero MRI to supplement ultrasound in the foetus at high risk of developmental brain or spine abnormality.

Authors:  P D Griffiths; M Porteous; G Mason; S Russell; J Morris; E M Fanou; M J Reeves
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Fetuses with ventriculomegaly diagnosed in the second trimester of pregnancy by in utero MR imaging: what happens in the third trimester?

Authors:  P D Griffiths; J E Morris; G Mason; S A Russell; M N J Paley; E H Whitby; M J Reeves
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Comparison of prenatal and postnatal MRI findings in the evaluation of intrauterine CNS anomalies requiring postnatal neurosurgical treatment.

Authors:  A Papadias; C Miller; W L Martin; M D Kilby; S Sgouros
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  MRI of the foetal brain using a rapid 3D steady-state sequence.

Authors:  P D Griffiths; D Jarvis; H McQuillan; F Williams; M Paley; P Armitage
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.