Literature DB >> 9536158

Birthweight of term infants and maternal occupation in a prospective cohort of pregnant women. The ALSPAC Study Team.

A Farrow1, K M Shea, R E Little.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the relation between birthweight of term infants and maternal occupation.
METHODS: Information on job titles since the age of 16, and sociodemographic and other lifestyle factors were obtained by means of questionnaires as part of the Avon longitudinal study of pregnancy and childhood (ALSPAC), from a cohort of 14,000 pregnant women. The British 1990 standard occupational classification was used to code jobs within nine major job groups.
RESULTS: For 9282 women who delivered term infants and reported a job for the relevant period, there was a significant difference in mean birthweight among the nine major job groups. A 148 g difference was found between the mean birthweight of infants born to women with professional occupations and those with plant and machine operative jobs. Multiple regression analysis adjusted for sex of infant, parity, maternal height, smoking, caffeine consumption, and race. After adjustment the maternal job was no longer significantly associated with birthweight.
CONCLUSION: Despite the absence of a significant association between birthweight and job after adjustment, there were several findings which agreed with publications on maternal occupation and pregnancy outcome. The major job groups with the lowest birthweights included the following jobs; metal forming or welding, electric or electronic work, jobs in the textile trade, and assembling and working with equipment (mobile and stationary). The lack of an association may indicate that the study was of insufficient power to detect a small difference; it may indicate the presence of confounding variables that were not adjusted for or it may indicate that no association exists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9536158      PMCID: PMC1757507          DOI: 10.1136/oem.55.1.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  34 in total

1.  Prematurity and work in pregnancy.

Authors:  A D McDonald; J C McDonald; B Armstrong; N M Cherry; A D Nolin; D Robert
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-01

2.  Effects of labor force participation on women's health: new evidence from a longitudinal study.

Authors:  I Waldron; J A Jacobs
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1988-12

Review 3.  Work in pregnancy: its evolving relationship with perinatal outcome (a review).

Authors:  M J Saurel-Cubizolles; M Kaminski
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Employment in pregnancy: prevalence, maternal characteristics, perinatal outcome.

Authors:  J F Murphy; M Dauncey; R Newcombe; J Garcia; D Elbourne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-05-26       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The longitudinal study of the northern Finland birth cohort of 1966.

Authors:  P Rantakallio
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  Outcome of pregnancy among women in anaesthetic practice.

Authors:  P O Pharoah; E Alberman; P Doyle; G Chamberlain
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1977-01-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Spontaneous abortions and reproductive selection mechanisms in the rubber and leather industry in Finland.

Authors:  K Hemminki; M L Niemi; P Kyyrönen; I Kilpikari; H Vainio
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1983-02

8.  Anatomy of the healthy worker effect: a critical review.

Authors:  C P Wen; S P Tsai; R L Gibson
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1983-04

9.  Occupation and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  A D McDonald; J C McDonald; B Armstrong; N Cherry; C Delorme; A D-Nolin; D Robert
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1987-08

10.  Pregnancy outcomes in women potentially exposed to occupational solvents and women working in the electronics industry.

Authors:  J A Lipscomb; L Fenster; M Wrensch; D Shusterman; S Swan
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1991-05
View more
  6 in total

1.  Differences in pre-pregnancy diet quality by occupation among employed women.

Authors:  Ibrahim Zaganjor; Suzan L Carmichael; A J Agopian; Andrew F Olshan; Tania A Desrosiers
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  Data Resource Profile: The ALSPAC birth cohort as a platform to study the relationship of environment and health and social factors.

Authors:  Andy Boyd; Richard Thomas; Anna L Hansell; John Gulliver; Lucy Mary Hicks; Rebecca Griggs; Joshua Vande Hey; Caroline M Taylor; Tim Morris; Jean Golding; Rita Doerner; Daniela Fecht; John Henderson; Debbie A Lawlor; Nicholas J Timpson; John Macleod
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 9.685

3.  Ergonomic demands and fetal loss in women in welding and electrical trades: A Canadian cohort study.

Authors:  Nicola Cherry; Jeremy Beach; Jean-Michel Galarneau
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  Born in Bradford, a cohort study of babies born in Bradford, and their parents: protocol for the recruitment phase.

Authors:  Pauline Raynor
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Partner smoking and maternal cotinine during pregnancy: implications for negative control methods.

Authors:  Amy E Taylor; George Davey Smith; Cristina B Bares; Alexis C Edwards; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Socioeconomic position during pregnancy and DNA methylation signatures at three stages across early life: epigenome-wide association studies in the ALSPAC birth cohort.

Authors:  Rossella Alfano; Florence Guida; Bruna Galobardes; Marc Chadeau-Hyam; Cyrille Delpierre; Akram Ghantous; John Henderson; Zdenko Herceg; Pooja Jain; Tim S Nawrot; Caroline Relton; Paolo Vineis; Raphaële Castagné; Michelle Plusquin
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.