Literature DB >> 24591956

Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in obstetric practice.

Aydın Köşüş1, Nermin Köşüş1, Betül Usluoğulları1, Müzeyyen Duran1, Nilgün Öztürk Turhan1, Mehmet Tekşam2.   

Abstract

Ultrasonography (USG) is the primary imaging method for prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormalities since its discovery. Although it is the primary method of fetal imaging, it cannot provide sufficient information about the fetus in some conditions such as maternal obesity, oligohydramnios and engagement of the fetal head. At this stage, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) facilitates examination by providing more specific information. The need and importance of fetal MRI applications further increased by the intrauterine surgery which is currently gaining popularity. Some advantages of fetal MRI over USG are the good texture of contrast, a greater study area and visualization of the lesion and neighbourhood relations, independence of the operators. Also it is not affected by maternal obesity and severe oligohydramnios. However, MRI is inadequate in detecting fetal limb and cardiac abnormalities when compared to USG. MRI is not used routinely in pregnancy. It is used in situations where nonionizing imaging methods are inadequate or ionizing radiation is required in pregnant women. It is not recommended during the first trimester. Contrast agent (Godalinium) is not used during pregnancy. It is believed that MRI is not harmful to the fetus, although the biological risk of MRI application is not known. MRI technique is superior to USG in the detection of corpus callosum dysgenesis, third-trimester evaluation of posterior fossa malformations, bilateral renal agenesis, diaphragmatic hernia and assessment of lung maturation. Especially, it is the method of choice for evaluation of central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities. Fetal MRI has a complementary role with USG. It provides important information for prenatal diagnosis, increases diagnostic accuracy, and in turn affects the prenatal treatment, prenatal interventions and birth plan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fetal magnetic resonance imaging; fetal ultrasonography

Year:  2011        PMID: 24591956      PMCID: PMC3939289          DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2011.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc        ISSN: 1309-0380


  64 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in fetal evaluation.

Authors:  D Levine
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02

Review 2.  Fetal imaging.

Authors:  Anne M Hubbard; Erin M Simon
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Neurodevelopmental risks in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: preliminary findings.

Authors:  F Haverkamp; C Lex; C Hanisch; H Fahnenstich; K Zerres
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Neurol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.140

Review 4.  Ultrafast fetal MRI and prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Anne M Hubbard
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Prenatal MRI evaluation of giant neck masses in preparation for the fetal exit procedure.

Authors:  A M Hubbard; T M Crombleholme; N S Adzick
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Complex fetal disorders: effect of MR imaging on management--preliminary clinical experience.

Authors:  F V Coakley; H Hricak; R A Filly; A J Barkovich; M R Harrison
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Tests for DNA and chromosomal damage induced by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Wolff; L E Crooks; P Brown; R Howard; R B Painter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Exclusion of fetal ventriculomegaly with a single measurement: the width of the lateral ventricular atrium.

Authors:  J D Cardoza; R B Goldstein; R A Filly
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Ultrafast scan magnetic resonance in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  A M Wagenvoort; M N Bekker; A T Go; F P Vandenbussche; M A van Buchem; J Valk; J M van Vugt
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.587

10.  The clinical diagnosis of asphyxia responsible for brain damage in the human fetus.

Authors:  J A Low; L L Simpson; D A Ramsey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Risks to the fetus from diagnostic imaging during pregnancy: review and proposal of a clinical protocol.

Authors:  Mafalda Gomes; Alexandra Matias; Filipe Macedo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-08-14

2.  Fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Two-Year Experience.

Authors:  Sepideh Sefidbakht; Sakineh Dehghani; Maryam Safari; Homeira Vafaei; Maryam Kasraeian
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 0.364

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.