Literature DB >> 2624829

The predictive value of quantitative computed tomography for vertebral body compressive strength and ash density.

L Mosekilde1, S M Bentzen, G Ortoft, J Jørgensen.   

Abstract

Whole lumbar vertebral sections (L2 and L3) were obtained from 30 elderly individuals aged 43-95 years, mean 81 years (13 females, 17 males). None of the subjects had had malignant diseases. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) was performed on an EMI 7070 scanner. One 8 mm slice parallel to the end-plates was obtained from the center of each vertebral body. The trabecular bone mass in each slice was outlined interactively by means of a tracer-ball. A CT-histogram was recorded inside this area, and average CT-values were expressed in Hounsfield Units (HU). The whole vertebral body (L2) was compressed in a materials testing machine. From the central part of L3, vertical cylindrical pure trabecular bone specimens were obtained. The biomechanical competence of these specimens was also assessed by means of a materials testing machine. Finally, all bone specimens were incinerated for determination of apparent ash-density. Highly significant positive correlations were found between average CT-values and (a) stress values of the trabecular bone (r = 0.81, p less than 0.001) and (b) ash-density of the pure trabecular bone (r = 0.81, p less than 0.001). Furthermore, a significant positive correlation was found between CT-values and (a) total vertebral body load (r = 0.72, p less than 0.001), (b) total vertebral body stress (load/cross-sectional area) (r = 0.55, p less than 0.001) and (c) ash-density of the whole vertebral body (r = 0.76, p less than 0.001). It is concluded that quantitative computed tomography gives valid predictions of both vertebral trabecular bone mass and mechanical competence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2624829     DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(89)90080-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  23 in total

1.  MRI of bone marrow in the distal radius: in vivo precision of effective transverse relaxation times.

Authors:  S Grampp; S Majumdar; M Jergas; P Lang; A Gies; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Fracture risk: a role for compact bone.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Bone densitometry of excised vertebrae; anatomical relationships.

Authors:  R B Mazess; P Pedersen; J Vetter; H S Barden
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength.

Authors:  Jenni M Buckley; Kenneth Loo; Julie Motherway
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Interrelationships between 3-T-MRI-derived cortical and trabecular bone structure parameters and quantitative-computed-tomography-derivedbone mineral density.

Authors:  Ahi Sema Issever; Thomas M Link; David Newitt; Thelma Munoz; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Device-specific weighted T-score for two quantitative ultrasounds: operational propositions for the management of osteoporosis for 65 years and older women in Switzerland.

Authors:  D Hans; F Hartl; M A Krieg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Distal radius fracture is an early sign of general osteoporosis: bone mass measurements in a population-based study.

Authors:  H Mallmin; S Ljunghall
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Assessment of trabecular bone structure using MDCT: comparison of 64- and 320-slice CT using HR-pQCT as the reference standard.

Authors:  Ahi S Issever; Thomas M Link; Marie Kentenich; Patrik Rogalla; Andrew J Burghardt; Galateia J Kazakia; Sharmila Majumdar; Gerd Diederichs
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Presence of intervertebral discs alters observed stiffness and failure mechanisms in the vertebra.

Authors:  Amira I Hussein; Zachary D Mason; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.