Literature DB >> 8455109

A questionnaire for patients' evaluations of their physicians' humanistic behaviors.

M J Weaver1, C L Ow, D J Walker, E F Degenhardt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine what behaviors patients perceive as reflecting a physician's humanistic qualities, to develop an instrument for patients to use to assess the humanistic behaviors of their own physicians, and to compare patient assessment of residents' humanistic behaviors with patient satisfaction and the assessment of attending physicians.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study, using patient interviews and questionnaires, and evaluations of residents by attending physicians.
SETTING: Inpatient medical service in a tertiary care teaching hospital and in a primary care internal medicine clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Six medical interns and six medical residents, 119 medical patients in the hospital, and 111 patients in the internal medicine clinic.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The 25-item Physicians' Humanistic Behaviors Questionnaire (PHBQ) was developed from patients' statements about important humanistic behaviors. The mean PHBQ scores were 4.46 +/- 0.22 (mean +/- SD, on a scale of 1 to 5) in the clinic and 4.18 +/- 18 in the hospital (p = 0.003). The Spearman's rank correlations between the PHBQ and the Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS) were r = 0.8741 (p < 0.001) in the hospital and r = 0.8751 (p < 0.001) in the internal medicine clinic. The Spearman's rank correlation between the hospital PHBQ and the attending physician evaluations (for the six residents for whom the authors had complete data) was r = 0.5753 (p = 0.232).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients can evaluate the humanistic behaviors of their physicians using the PHBQ. There is good correlation between the PHBQ and patient satisfaction, which supports the validity of the PHBQ. The relative lack of agreement between patients and attending physicians suggests different observations, criteria, or standards. The higher ratings from patients in the clinic compared with those from patients in the hospital suggest that residents' behaviors are different or that patients have different observations, criteria, or standards in the two settings. Therefore, a complete assessment of residents' humanistic behaviors may require sampling in both settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8455109     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  23 in total

1.  The use of nurses to evaluate houseofficers' humanistic behavior.

Authors:  C B Kaplan; R M Centor
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The humanities, humanistic behavior, and the humane physician: a cautionary note.

Authors:  R M Arnold; G J Povar; J D Howell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Use of nonphysician staff to evaluate humanistic behavior of internal medicine residents and faculty members.

Authors:  L S Linn; R K Oye; D W Cope; M R DiMatteo
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1986-11

4.  Nurses as evaluators of the humanistic behavior of internal medicine residents.

Authors:  P S Butterfield; E L Mazzaferri; L A Sachs
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1987-10

5.  Assessment of interpersonal skills and humanistic qualities in medical residents.

Authors:  R R Blurton; E L Mazzaferri
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1985-08

6.  A review of systems for the personal aspects of patient care.

Authors:  D A Matthews; A R Feinstein
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.378

7.  Evaluating humanistic attributes of internal medicine residents.

Authors:  J Klessig; A S Robbins; D Wieland; L Rubenstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Teaching humanistic and psychosocial aspects of care: current practices and attitudes.

Authors:  W T Merkel; R B Margolis; R C Smith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Evaluation of intern performance by medical inpatients.

Authors:  D A Matthews; W H Sledge; P B Lieberman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Sociodemographic and premedical school factors related to postgraduate physicians' humanistic performance.

Authors:  L S Linn; D W Cope; A Robbins
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1987-07
View more
  19 in total

1.  Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the physician achievement review.

Authors:  W Hall; C Violato; R Lewkonia; J Lockyer; H Fidler; J Toews; P Jennett; M Donoff; D Moores
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-07-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  ACGME core competencies: helpful information for psychologists.

Authors:  Barbara A Cubic; Edwin E Gatewood
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2008-03-14

3.  Improving in-training evaluation programs.

Authors:  J Turnbull; J Gray; J MacFadyen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Guidelines for promotion of clinician-educators. The Society of General Internal Medicine Education Committee.

Authors:  R M Lubitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  What are the key attributes of primary care for patients? Building a conceptual 'map' of patient preferences.

Authors:  Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi; Peter Bower; Nichola Mead; Ruth McDonald; Diane Whalley; Martin Roland
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  The Chinese Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale-revised (C-MISS-R): development and validation.

Authors:  W W T Lam; R Fielding; Louis Chow; Miranda Chan; Gabriel M Leung; Ella Y Y Ho
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Meeting walk-in patients' expectations for testing. Effects on satisfaction.

Authors:  G W Froehlich; H G Welch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Improving the care of children with advanced cancer by using an electronic patient-reported feedback intervention: results from the PediQUEST randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joanne Wolfe; Liliana Orellana; E Francis Cook; Christina Ullrich; Tammy Kang; Jeffrey Russell Geyer; Chris Feudtner; Jane C Weeks; Veronica Dussel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Evaluation of humanistic qualities and communication skills.

Authors:  P G Ramsey; M Wenrich
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Do physicians take into account patients' expectations?

Authors:  C Sanchez-Menegay; H Stalder
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.