OBJECTIVE: To assess current practices and attitudes toward teaching humanistic and psychosocial aspects of care in internal medicine residency programs. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Survey questionnaires were sent to residency directors at all 434 internal medicine residency programs accredited in 1985-1986. Response rate for two mailings was 71%. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 78% OF RESIDENCY DIRECTORS and 70% of department chairpersons had high or moderately high levels of commitment to teaching humanistic/psychosocial aspects of care, but only 44% of responding programs offered mandatory training, and only 18% offered elective training in these areas. Obstacles to expanded teaching of the humanistic/psychosocial aspects rated high or moderately high by residency directors included insufficient curriculum time (51%), lack of trained faculty (44%), and pressures to reduce both training costs (40%) and patient-care costs (37%). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the training that does occur in the humanistic/psychosocial aspects of care probably happens informally via mentoring and role modeling. Appeals to expand teaching in these areas raise questions regarding what to include in medical training and the proper scope of internal medicine. Sustainable change will depend on the politics of resource distribution and the influence of general internal medicine and primary care on traditional training.
OBJECTIVE: To assess current practices and attitudes toward teaching humanistic and psychosocial aspects of care in internal medicine residency programs. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Survey questionnaires were sent to residency directors at all 434 internal medicine residency programs accredited in 1985-1986. Response rate for two mailings was 71%. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 78% OF RESIDENCY DIRECTORS and 70% of department chairpersons had high or moderately high levels of commitment to teaching humanistic/psychosocial aspects of care, but only 44% of responding programs offered mandatory training, and only 18% offered elective training in these areas. Obstacles to expanded teaching of the humanistic/psychosocial aspects rated high or moderately high by residency directors included insufficient curriculum time (51%), lack of trained faculty (44%), and pressures to reduce both training costs (40%) and patient-care costs (37%). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the training that does occur in the humanistic/psychosocial aspects of care probably happens informally via mentoring and role modeling. Appeals to expand teaching in these areas raise questions regarding what to include in medical training and the proper scope of internal medicine. Sustainable change will depend on the politics of resource distribution and the influence of general internal medicine and primary care on traditional training.
Authors: J Kosecoff; A Fink; R H Brook; A R Davies; G Goldberg; L S Linn; V A Clark; P C Salisbury Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1985-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: S E Bennett; J D Goodson; J E Izen; W T Branch; W C Clark; C J Hatem; R S Lawrence; T L Delbanco; A H Goroll Journal: Med Care Date: 1985-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: P R Williamson; R C Smith; D E Kern; M Lipkin; L R Barker; R B Hoppe; J Florek Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 1992 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: R C Smith; G Osborn; R B Hoppe; J S Lyles; L Van Egeren; R Henry; D Sego; P Alguire; B Stoffelmayr Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 1991 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.128