Literature DB >> 10420867

Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the physician achievement review.

W Hall1, C Violato, R Lewkonia, J Lockyer, H Fidler, J Toews, P Jennett, M Donoff, D Moores.   

Abstract

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, in collaboration with the Universities of Calgary and Alberta, has developed a program to routinely assess the performance of physicians, intended primarily for quality improvement in medical practice. The Physician Achievement Review (PAR) provides a multidimensional view of performance through structured feedback to physicians. The program will also provide a new mechanism for identifying physicians for whom more detailed assessment of practice performance or medical competence may be needed. Questionnaires were created to assess an array of performance attributes, and then appropriate assessors were designated--the physician himself or herself (self-evaluation), patients, medical peers, consultants and referring physicians, and non-physician coworkers. A pilot study with 308 physician volunteers was used to evaluate the psychometric and statistical properties of the questionnaires and to develop operating policies. The pilot surveys showed good statistical validity and technical reliability of the PAR questionnaires. For only 28 (9.1%) of the physicians were the PAR results more than one standard deviation from the peer group means for 3 or more of the 5 major domains of assessment (self, patients, peers, consultants and coworkers). In post-survey feedback, two-thirds of the physicians indicated that they were considering or had implemented changes to their medical practice on the basis of their PAR data. The estimated operating cost of the PAR program is approximately $200 per physician. In February 1999, on the basis of the operating experience and the results of the pilot survey, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta implemented this innovative program, in which all Alberta physicians will be required to participate every 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10420867      PMCID: PMC1232653     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  7 in total

1.  Five-year results of the peer assessment program of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

Authors:  R G McAuley; W M Paul; G H Morrison; R F Beckett; C H Goldsmith
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance.

Authors:  P G Ramsey; M D Wenrich; J D Carline; T S Inui; E B Larson; J P LoGerfo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Ratings of the performances of practicing internists by hospital-based registered nurses.

Authors:  M D Wenrich; J D Carline; L M Giles; P G Ramsey
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Physician-assessment and physician-enhancement programs in Canada.

Authors:  G G Page; J Bates; S M Dyer; D R Vincent; G Bordage; A Jacques; A Sindon; T Kaigas; G R Norman; M Kopelow
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The costs and benefits of asking patients for their opinions about general practice.

Authors:  H Hearnshaw; R Baker; A Cooper; M Eccles; J Soper
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  A questionnaire for patients' evaluations of their physicians' humanistic behaviors.

Authors:  M J Weaver; C L Ow; D J Walker; E F Degenhardt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Resident-patient interactions: the humanistic qualities of internal medicine residents assessed by patients, attending physicians, program supervisors, and nurses.

Authors:  J O Woolliscroft; J D Howell; B P Patel; D B Swanson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.893

  7 in total
  41 in total

Review 1.  Revalidation of doctors in Canada.

Authors:  W D Dauphinee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-30

2.  Multisource feedback: a method of assessing surgical practice.

Authors:  Claudio Violato; Jocelyn Lockyer; Herta Fidler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-03-08

Review 3.  Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians.

Authors:  Richard Evans; Glyn Elwyn; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-22

4.  College certification and recertification.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Use of a standardized patient exercise to assess core competencies during fellowship training.

Authors:  Curtis T Barry; Uri Avissar; Maureen Asebrook; Michael A Sostok; Kenneth E Sherman; Stephen D Zucker
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-03

6.  Multisource feedback in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  Eric J Warm; Daniel Schauer; Brian Revis; James R Boex
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-06

7.  Structured teaching and assessment: a new chart-stimulated recall worksheet for family medicine residents.

Authors:  Shirley Schipper; Shelley Ross
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Using data envelopment analysis for assessing the performance of pediatric emergency department physicians.

Authors:  Javier Fiallos; Jonathan Patrick; Wojtek Michalowski; Ken Farion
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2015-10-05

9.  Portfolios, appraisal, revalidation, and all that: a user's guide for consultants.

Authors:  H Davies; N Khera; J Stroobant
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Using a 'peer assessment questionnaire' in primary medical care.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Malcolm Lewis; Richard Evans; Hayley Hutchings
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.