G W Froehlich1, H G Welch. 1. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vt 05009, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between meeting expectations for tests and visit satisfaction in walk-in patients. DESIGN: Survey of patients before and after the visit. SETTING: Walk-in medical clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS: 143 male veterans were eligible for this study: 128 agreed to participate; 109 completed both questionnaires. MEASUREMENTS: Before the visit, we measured health status, baseline satisfaction with care, and expectations for common tests. After the visit, we measured visit-specific satisfaction, patient perception of provider interpersonal behavior (provider humanism), and patient report of whether specific tests were received. Logistic regression was used to determine the effect of meeting expectations for tests while controlling for other factors. RESULTS: Of all patients, 62% expected one or more tests, nearly as many as expected a medication or a diagnosis. In multivariate analysis restricted to those expecting tests, provider humanism was the sole significant predictor of visit-specific satisfaction (odds ration [OR] 6.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6, 26.1). The proportion of expectations for testing that were met was not significantly associated with satisfaction (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.92, 1.21). CONCLUSIONS: Meeting patient expectations for tests does not have an important effect on satisfaction. Even in the walk-in setting, patient perception of the providers' interpersonal behavior was a more important factor in satisfaction with the visit. Physicians who order tests solely to improve patient satisfaction may be able to reduce unnecessary testing without decreasing patient satisfaction.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between meeting expectations for tests and visit satisfaction in walk-in patients. DESIGN: Survey of patients before and after the visit. SETTING: Walk-in medical clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS: 143 male veterans were eligible for this study: 128 agreed to participate; 109 completed both questionnaires. MEASUREMENTS: Before the visit, we measured health status, baseline satisfaction with care, and expectations for common tests. After the visit, we measured visit-specific satisfaction, patient perception of provider interpersonal behavior (provider humanism), and patient report of whether specific tests were received. Logistic regression was used to determine the effect of meeting expectations for tests while controlling for other factors. RESULTS: Of all patients, 62% expected one or more tests, nearly as many as expected a medication or a diagnosis. In multivariate analysis restricted to those expecting tests, provider humanism was the sole significant predictor of visit-specific satisfaction (odds ration [OR] 6.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6, 26.1). The proportion of expectations for testing that were met was not significantly associated with satisfaction (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.92, 1.21). CONCLUSIONS: Meeting patient expectations for tests does not have an important effect on satisfaction. Even in the walk-in setting, patient perception of the providers' interpersonal behavior was a more important factor in satisfaction with the visit. Physicians who order tests solely to improve patient satisfaction may be able to reduce unnecessary testing without decreasing patient satisfaction.
Authors: Matthias Schonlau; Rita Mangione-Smith; Kitty S Chan; Joan Keesey; Mayde Rosen; Thomas A Louis; Shin-Yi Wu; Emmett Keeler Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2005 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: A D Federman; E F Cook; R S Phillips; A L Puopolo; J S Haas; T A Brennan; H R Burstin Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Roger T Anderson; Carol S Weisman; Fabian Camacho; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Jillian T Henderson; Deborah F Farmer Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Ritesh N Kumar; Duane M Kirking; Steven L Hass; Amiram D Vinokur; Stephanie D Taylor; Mark J Atkinson; Patrick L McKercher Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2007-05-26 Impact factor: 4.147