Literature DB >> 8425991

Analysis of coronary blood flow velocity dynamics in angiographically normal and stenosed arteries before and after endolumen enlargement by angioplasty.

E O Ofili1, M J Kern, A J Labovitz, J A St Vrain, J Segal, F V Aguirre, R Castello.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess whether the spectral waveform of coronary velocity on Doppler study is characteristically altered in the presence of significant stenosis with normalization of the spectral waveform after relief of endolumen obstruction.
BACKGROUND: Although coronary flow reserve determinations have provided physiologic information complementary to the angiographic percent diameter narrowing, flow velocity measurements have been limited to proximal arteries with inconsistent results after angioplasty. A 12-MHz Doppler guide wire permits flow velocity determination in the proximal and distal coronary artery with fast Fourier spectral analysis.
METHODS: With the Doppler guide wire, proximal arterial flow velocity and flow reserve measurements in 17 angiographically normal arteries were compared with measurements in 29 significantly stenosed arteries. Proximal and distal flow velocity measurements were also obtained before and after angioplasty of the 29 abnormal arteries. Velocity spectrum was digitized to compute peak diastolic velocity, peak systolic velocity, mean velocity, diastolic/systolic velocity ratio and first third and first half flow fraction.
RESULTS: Compared with proximal stenosed arteries, proximal normal arteries had significantly higher peak diastolic velocity (64 +/- 26 cm/s vs. 41 +/- 26 cm/s) and higher coronary vasodilator reserve (2.3 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.7). Normal arteries had higher flows in the first third and first half of the coronary cycle (46 +/- 3% vs. 39 +/- 7% and 65 +/- 2% vs. 56 +/- 10%, respectively). Before angioplasty, coronary velocity variables were significantly lower distal than proximal to the stenosis. After angioplasty, there was a greater mean increase in distal velocities (200% vs. 90% for the proximal arteries) that resulted in near equalization of proximal and distal mean velocity and a significant reduction in proximal/distal mean velocity ratio (2.4 +/- 1.7 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.4).
CONCLUSIONS: Before angioplasty, abnormal coronary flow velocity dynamics are more marked distal than proximal to the stenosis. Greater increase in coronary flow velocities in the distal circulation after relief of endolumen obstruction results in a significant reduction in the proximal/distal flow velocity ratio. Thus, normalization of Doppler-derived flow velocity variables with marked reduction of the proximal/distal flow velocity ratios parallels angiographic success and may prove useful as an additional end point measurement in interventional cases with questionable angiographic findings.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8425991     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90668-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  19 in total

1.  Effect of stenting on coronary flow velocity reserve: comparison of coil and tubular stents.

Authors:  C J Vrints; M J Claeys; J Bosmans; V Conraads; J P Snoeck
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Invasive assessment of the coronary circulation: intravascular ultrasound and Doppler.

Authors:  David E Newby; Keith A A Fox
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Accurate measurement of pulsatile flow velocity in a small tube phantom: comparison of phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging and intraluminal Doppler guidewire.

Authors:  Haruhiko Machida; Yoshiaki Komori; Eiko Ueno; Yun Shen; Masami Hirata; Shinya Kojima; Munekuni Sato; Takeshi Okazaki; Ai Masukawa; Satoru Morita; Kazufumi Suzuki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Coronary flow velocity changes in response to hypercapnia: assessment by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  Wendy S Tzou; Claudia E Korcarz; Susan E Aeschlimann; Barbara J Morgan; James B Skatrud; James H Stein
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Differences in cardiac microcirculatory wave patterns between the proximal left mainstem and proximal right coronary artery.

Authors:  Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Justin E Davies; Iqbal S Malik; Jazmin Aguado-Sierra; Keith Willson; Rodney A Foale; Kim H Parker; Alun D Hughes; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Improved assessment of intravascular Doppler coronary flow velocity profile.

Authors:  E Wellnhofer; W Finke; L Bernard; W Dänschel; E Fleck
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-02

Review 7.  New concepts for interpretation of intracoronary velocity and pressure tracings.

Authors:  C Di Mario; R Gil; M Sunamura; P W Serruys
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-11

8.  Non-invasive measurement of coronary flow reserve in children with Kawasaki disease.

Authors:  N Noto; K Karasawa; H Kanamaru; M Ayusawa; N Sumitomo; T Okada; K Harada
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Estimation of coronary flow reserve by intracoronary administration of nicorandil: comparison with intracoronary administration of papaverine.

Authors:  F Inoue; T Hashimoto; S Fujimoto; S Uemura; A Kawamoto; K Dohi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Stress phase angle depicts differences in coronary artery hemodynamics due to changes in flow and geometry after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Ryo Torii; Nigel B Wood; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Andrew W Dowsey; Andrew R Wright; Alun D Hughes; Justin Davies; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet; Guang-Zhong Yang; Simon A McG Thom; X Yun Xu
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.