Literature DB >> 18641272

Differences in cardiac microcirculatory wave patterns between the proximal left mainstem and proximal right coronary artery.

Nearchos Hadjiloizou1, Justin E Davies, Iqbal S Malik, Jazmin Aguado-Sierra, Keith Willson, Rodney A Foale, Kim H Parker, Alun D Hughes, Darrel P Francis, Jamil Mayet.   

Abstract

Despite having almost identical origins and similar perfusion pressures, the flow-velocity waveforms in the left and right coronary arteries are strikingly different. We hypothesized that pressure differences originating from the distal (microcirculatory) bed would account for the differences in the flow-velocity waveform. We used wave intensity analysis to separate and quantify proximal- and distal-originating pressures to study the differences in velocity waveforms. In 20 subjects with unobstructed coronary arteries, sensor-tipped intra-arterial wires were used to measure simultaneous pressure and Doppler velocity in the proximal left main stem (LMS) and proximal right coronary artery (RCA). Proximal- and distal-originating waves were separated using wave intensity analysis, and differences in waves were examined in relation to structural and anatomic differences between the two arteries. Diastolic flow velocity was lower in the RCA than in the LMS (35.1 +/- 21.4 vs. 56.4 +/- 32.5 cm/s, P < 0.002), and, consequently, the diastolic-to-systolic ratio of peak flow velocity in the RCA was significantly less than in the LMS (1.00 +/- 0.32 vs. 1.79 +/- 0.48, P < 0.001). This was due to a lower distal-originating suction wave (8.2 +/- 6.6 x 10(3) vs. 16.0 +/- 12.2 x 10(3) W.m(-2).s(-1), P < 0.01). The suction wave in the LMS correlated positively with left ventricular pressure (r = 0.6, P < 0.01) and in the RCA with estimated right ventricular systolic pressure (r = 0.7, P = 0.05) but not with the respective diameter in these arteries. In contrast to the LMS, where coronary flow velocity was predominantly diastolic, in the proximal RCA coronary flow velocity was similar in systole and diastole. This difference was due to a smaller distal-originating suction wave in the RCA, which can be explained by differences in elastance and pressure generated between right and left ventricles.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18641272      PMCID: PMC2544490          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00510.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  25 in total

1.  Effects of left ventricular contractility and coronary vascular resistance on coronary dynamics.

Authors:  Yi-Hui Sun; Todd J Anderson; Kim H Parker; John V Tyberg
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 2.  Pressure-flow relations in coronary circulation.

Authors:  J I Hoffman; J A Spaan
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 3.  Physiological hypotheses--intramyocardial pressure. A new concept, suggestions for measurement.

Authors:  N Westerhof
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 17.165

4.  Varying elastance concept may explain coronary systolic flow impediment.

Authors:  R Krams; P Sipkema; N Westerhof
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1989-11

5.  What stops the flow of blood from the heart?

Authors:  K H Parker; C J Jones; J R Dawson; D G Gibson
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Noninvasive estimation of systolic pressure in the right ventricle in patients with tricuspid regurgitation.

Authors:  T Skjaerpe; L Hatle
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Distribution of the coronary blood flow across the canine heart wall during systole.

Authors:  J M Downey; E S Kirk
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Analysis of coronary blood flow velocity dynamics in angiographically normal and stenosed arteries before and after endolumen enlargement by angioplasty.

Authors:  E O Ofili; M J Kern; A J Labovitz; J A St Vrain; J Segal; F V Aguirre; R Castello
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Diastolic-systolic coronary flow differences are caused by intramyocardial pump action in the anesthetized dog.

Authors:  J A Spaan; N P Breuls; J D Laird
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Measurement from arteriograms of regional myocardial bed size distal to any point in the coronary vascular tree for assessing anatomic area at risk.

Authors:  C Seiler; R L Kirkeeide; K L Gould
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical models for coronary vascular biomechanics: progress & challenges.

Authors:  Sarah L Waters; Jordi Alastruey; Daniel A Beard; Peter H M Bovendeerd; Peter F Davies; Girija Jayaraman; Oliver E Jensen; Jack Lee; Kim H Parker; Aleksander S Popel; Timothy W Secomb; Maria Siebes; Spencer J Sherwin; Rebecca J Shipley; Nicolas P Smith; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Major influence of a 'smoke and mirrors' effect caused by wave reflection on early diastolic coronary arterial wave intensity.

Authors:  Jonathan P Mynard; Daniel J Penny; Joseph J Smolich
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Potential and limitations of wave intensity analysis in coronary arteries.

Authors:  Maria Siebes; Christina Kolyva; Bart-Jan Verhoeff; Jan J Piek; Jos A Spaan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Stress phase angle depicts differences in coronary artery hemodynamics due to changes in flow and geometry after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Ryo Torii; Nigel B Wood; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Andrew W Dowsey; Andrew R Wright; Alun D Hughes; Justin Davies; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet; Guang-Zhong Yang; Simon A McG Thom; X Yun Xu
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Estimation of coronary wave intensity analysis using noninvasive techniques and its application to exercise physiology.

Authors:  Christopher J Broyd; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Sayan Sen; Ricardo Petraco; Siana Jones; Rasha Al-Lamee; Nicolas Foin; Mahmud Al-Bustami; Amarjit Sethi; Raffi Kaprielian; Punit Ramrakha; Masood Khan; Iqbal S Malik; Darrel P Francis; Kim Parker; Alun D Hughes; Ghada W Mikhail; Jamil Mayet; Justin E Davies
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 6.  RV diastolic dysfunction: time to re-evaluate its importance in heart failure.

Authors:  Richard G Axell; Stephen P Hoole; James Hampton-Till; Paul A White
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  Hemodynamic changes in left anterior descending coronary artery and anterior interventricular vein during right ventricular apical pacing: a doppler ultrasound study in open chest beagles.

Authors:  Jing Lu; Wenhua Li; Ying Fu; Bin Long; Jie Shen; Li Su; Lixue Yin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Enhancing coronary Wave Intensity Analysis robustness by high order central finite differences.

Authors:  Simone Rivolo; Kaleab N Asrress; Amedeo Chiribiri; Eva Sammut; Roman Wesolowski; Lars Ø Bloch; Anne K Grøndal; Jesper L Hønge; Won Y Kim; Michael Marber; Simon Redwood; Eike Nagel; Nicolas P Smith; Jack Lee
Journal:  Artery Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.597

9.  The role of biofluid mechanics in the assessment of clinical and pathological observations: sixth International Bio-Fluid Mechanics Symposium and Workshop, March 28-30, 2008 Pasadena, California.

Authors:  Maria Siebes; Yiannis Ventikos
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Towards patient-specific modeling of coronary hemodynamics in healthy and diseased state.

Authors:  Arjen van der Horst; Frits L Boogaard; Marcel van't Veer; Marcel C M Rutten; Nico H J Pijls; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.