Literature DB >> 8562231

New concepts for interpretation of intracoronary velocity and pressure tracings.

C Di Mario1, R Gil, M Sunamura, P W Serruys.   

Abstract

The development of quantitative angiography and the introduction of new imaging techniques cannot replace functional methods of assessing the severity of stenosis. Measurement of transstenotic pressure gradient and poststenotic flow velocity using miniaturised sensors with guidewire technology offers an alternative to the conventional non-invasive methods that is immediately applicable in the catheterisation laboratory during interventional procedures. The complexity of the coronary circulation, however, makes it difficult to establish simple cut-off criteria to identify the presence of a flow-limiting stenosis. For intermediate lesions or in the presence of variable haemodynamic conditions, the accuracy of the assessment can be improved by the application of more complex indices proposed and validated in the laboratory animals. Two of these indices are myocardial fractional flow reserve and the slope of the instantaneous relation between pressure or pressure gradient and flow velocity.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8562231      PMCID: PMC484066          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.74.5.485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  40 in total

1.  Pressure drop across artificially induced stenoses in the femoral arteries of dogs.

Authors:  D F Young; N R Cholvin; A C Roth
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Platelet aggregation in partially obstructed vessels and its elimination with aspirin.

Authors:  J D Folts; E B Crowell; G G Rowe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Values and limitations of transstenotic pressure gradients measured during percutaneous coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  P W Serruys; W Wijns; J H Reiber; P de Feyter; M van den Brand; F Piscione; P G Hugenholtz
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  K L Gould; K Lipscomb; G W Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Does the quantitative assessment of coronary artery dimensions predict the physiologic significance of a coronary stenosis?

Authors:  F Zijlstra; J van Ommeren; J H Reiber; P W Serruys
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Diastolic-systolic coronary flow differences are caused by intramyocardial pump action in the anesthetized dog.

Authors:  J A Spaan; N P Breuls; J D Laird
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  A R Grüntzig; A Senning; W E Siegenthaler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-07-12       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VII. Validation of coronary flow reserve as a single integrated functional measure of stenosis severity reflecting all its geometric dimensions.

Authors:  R L Kirkeeide; K L Gould; L Parsel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Prediction of the physiologic significance of coronary arterial lesions by quantitative lesion geometry in patients with limited coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R F Wilson; M L Marcus; C W White
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Blood flow reductions in stenosed canine coronary arteries: vasospasm or platelet aggregation?

Authors:  J D Folts; K Gallagher; G G Rowe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical models for coronary vascular biomechanics: progress & challenges.

Authors:  Sarah L Waters; Jordi Alastruey; Daniel A Beard; Peter H M Bovendeerd; Peter F Davies; Girija Jayaraman; Oliver E Jensen; Jack Lee; Kim H Parker; Aleksander S Popel; Timothy W Secomb; Maria Siebes; Spencer J Sherwin; Rebecca J Shipley; Nicolas P Smith; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Coronary pressure and flow relationships in humans: phasic analysis of normal and pathological vessels and the implications for stenosis assessment: a report from the Iberian-Dutch-English (IDEAL) collaborators.

Authors:  Sukhjinder S Nijjer; Guus A de Waard; Sayan Sen; Tim P van de Hoef; Ricardo Petraco; Mauro Echavarría-Pinto; Martijn A van Lavieren; Martijn Meuwissen; Ibrahim Danad; Paul Knaapen; Javier Escaned; Jan J Piek; Justin E Davies; Niels van Royen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 29.983

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.