Literature DB >> 17360018

Accommodation and induced myopia in marmosets.

David Troilo1, Nicole Quinn, Kayla Baker.   

Abstract

Accommodation may indirectly influence visually guided eye growth by affecting the retinal defocus signal used to guide growth. Specifically, increased lags of accommodation associated with low stimulus-response (S-R) function slopes will impose increased hyperopic blur on the retina and may induce axial elongation and myopia. The purpose of this study was (1) to measure accommodation in awake, free viewing marmosets and (2) compare accommodation behavior in marmosets before and after inducing different amounts of myopia with binocular spectacle lenses. In untreated marmosets, the average accommodation S-R slope approached one, but showed considerable inter-individual variability (mean+/-SD: 0.964+/-0.249 for monocular viewing; 0.895+/-0.235 for binocular viewing; monocular and binocular measures not significantly different). The monocular S-R slopes were significantly reduced following a period of lens rearing that produced axial myopia (change in slope=-0.30+/-0.30, p<.01) and the reduction in slope was proportional to the amount of myopia induced (p<.01). The S-R slopes measured either under monocular or binocular conditions before induction of myopia were not well correlated with the degree of myopia induced (monocular: r=-.240, p=.453; binocular: r=-.060, p=.824). These results support the hypothesis that the reduction in S-R slope in myopes is a consequence of the myopia induced. The alternative hypothesis-that low S-R slope increases susceptibility to the development of myopia--is not supported by the weak correlation between the pre-manipulation S-R slopes and the magnitude of the myopic shift.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17360018      PMCID: PMC1892168          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  107 in total

1.  Wavefront aberration and its relationship to the accommodative stimulus-response function in myopic subjects.

Authors:  Charlotte A Hazel; Michael J Cox; Niall C Strang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Blur adaptation and myopia.

Authors:  Sini George; Mark Rosenfield
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Blur adaptation in myopes.

Authors:  Mark Rosenfield; Susan E Hong; Sini George
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  The role of neural and optical factors in limiting visual resolution in myopia.

Authors:  N C Strang; B Winn; A Bradley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The effectiveness of 0.5% atropine in controlling high myopia in children.

Authors:  A C Chou; Y F Shih; T C Ho; L L Lin
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 6.  Accommodation function of the human eye.

Authors:  F M Toates
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  The treatment of myopia with atropine and bifocals. A long-term prospective study.

Authors:  R S Brodstein; D E Brodstein; R J Olson; S C Hunt; R R Williams
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  The response to visual form deprivation differs with age in marmosets.

Authors:  David Troilo; Debora L Nickla
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Lower-field myopia and astigmatism in amphibians and chickens.

Authors:  F Schaeffel; G Hagel; J Eikermann; T Collett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Refraction, nearwork and education. A population study in Newfoundland.

Authors:  A Richler; J C Bear
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1980-06
View more
  18 in total

1.  Color blobs in cortical areas V1 and V2 of the new world monkey Callithrix jacchus, revealed by non-differential optical imaging.

Authors:  Matthias F Valverde Salzmann; Andreas Bartels; Nikos K Logothetis; Almut Schüz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A randomized trial using progressive addition lenses to evaluate theories of myopia progression in children with a high lag of accommodation.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Loraine T Sinnott; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Guinea pig ciliary muscle development.

Authors:  Andrew D Pucker; Ashley R Carpenter; Kirk M McHugh; Donald O Mutti
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Comparison of form-deprived myopia and lens-induced myopia in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Hui Xiao; Zhong-Yi Fan; Xiao-Dan Tian; Yan-Chun Xu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 6.  Perspective: how might emmetropization and genetic factors produce myopia in normal eyes?

Authors:  John T Siegwart; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Eyes in various species can shorten to compensate for myopic defocus.

Authors:  Xiaoying Zhu; Neville A McBrien; Earl L Smith; David Troilo; Josh Wallman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The effect of simultaneous negative and positive defocus on eye growth and development of refractive state in marmosets.

Authors:  Alexandra Benavente-Perez; Ann Nour; David Troilo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  The influence of first near-spectacle reading correction on accommodation and its interaction with convergence.

Authors:  Indu Vedamurthy; Wendy W Harrison; Yue Liu; Ian Cox; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Imposed anisometropia, accommodation, and regulation of refractive state.

Authors:  David Troilo; Kristen Totonelly; Elise Harb
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.