Literature DB >> 8335067

Relationships between touch sensations and estimated population responses of peripheral afferent mechanoreceptors.

R H Cohen1, C J Vierck.   

Abstract

Trapezoidal indentations of the skin by a 0.5-mm-diameter probe were presented at different rates and loads (forces) to the human fingertip, in order to compare estimates of population responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors with the quality and magnitude of tactile sensations. The subjects were first trained to attend to and evaluate variations in the magnitude of touch sensations associated with the onset ramp, the plateau period, and the offset ramp. They examined a series of line drawings that illustrated a variety of temporal profiles for sensation magnitude. The line drawings provided a straight-forward means of describing temporal fluctuations of sensation intensity, which corresponded well to psychophysical ratios that were determined subsequently with a matching procedure. Influences of ramp rate on qualities of touch sensations were evaluated by tabulating verbal descriptions of sensory experiences. Each of three rate conditions generated a different quality of sensation during the dynamic portions of stimulation. Onsets and offsets at 100 g/s were described as "taps". During ramps at 10 g/s the quality was described as "rolling" or "moving". At 1 g/s no sense of motion was detected; instead, a "pressure" sensation was identified. Touch sensations during the plateau were always described as a pressure. The subjective magnitudes of touch sensations associated with the onset, plateau, and offset were equated by comparing different components of paired stimuli. At 100 g/s, when subjects matched the offset sensation from the first of a pair of stimuli with the onset sensation from the second, the force of the stimulus producing the offset sensation was 1.3 times greater than the intensity of the stimulus that produced the onset sensation. Matching of the plateau sensation (evaluated during the last 1.5 s of the 2.5-s plateau period) with the onset sensation required a plateau stimulus that was 1.7 times greater in force than the stimulus which produced the onset. Comparison of stimulus intensities producing a match of plateau and offset sensations with stimulus intensities predicted from the previous matches (onset versus offset and onset versus plateau) demonstrated a mean within-subject error of 4%. The mean ratio of plateau to offset forces that produced a match was 1.8:1.3. In a matching procedure in which subjects compared the subjective magnitudes of plateau sensations following onset ramps of different rates, onset ramp rate significantly influenced the magnitude of pressure sensations. The ratios of plateau forces which produced equal magnitudes of sensation following 1, 10, and 100 g/s ramps were 1.6:1.3:1.0.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8335067     DOI: 10.1007/bf00230475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements.

Authors:  R H LaMotte; V B Mountcastle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Stimulus-response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area.

Authors:  M Knibestöl
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Vibrotactile intensity discrimination measured by three methods.

Authors:  G A Gescheider; S J Bolanowski; R T Verrillo; D J Arpajian; T F Ryan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Quantitative neural and psychophysical data for cutaneous mechanoreceptor function.

Authors:  L Kruger; B Kenton
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1973-01-15       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter-vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys. Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination.

Authors:  V B Mountcastle; W H Talbot; H Sakata; J Hyvärinen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innervating glabrous skin of the monkey.

Authors:  K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Intensity of sensation related to activity of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive units in the human hand.

Authors:  M Knibestöl; A B Vallbo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Projections from Pacinian corpuscles and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors of glabrous skin to the cat's spinal cord.

Authors:  A G Brown; R E Fyffe; R Noble
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The neural signal for skin indentation depth. I. Changing indentations.

Authors:  P R Burgess; J Mei; R P Tuckett; K W Horch; C M Ballinger; D A Poulos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Effects of spinal lesions on temporal resolution of cutaneous sensations.

Authors:  C J Vierck; R H Cohen; B Y Cooper
Journal:  Somatosens Res       Date:  1985
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Tactile intensity and population codes.

Authors:  Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Testing Assumptions in Human Pain Models: Psychophysical Differences Between First and Second Pain.

Authors:  Nathanial R Eckert; Charles J Vierck; Corey B Simon; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Roger B Fillingim; Joseph L Riley
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Population estimates for responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors to a vertically indenting probe on the glabrous skin of monkeys.

Authors:  R H Cohen; C J Vierck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Responses of areas 3b and 1 in anesthetized squirrel monkeys to single- and dual-site stimulation of the digits.

Authors:  Robert M Friedman; Li Min Chen; Anna W Roe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Influence of physico-chemical, mechanical and morphological fingerpad properties on the frictional distinction of sticky/slippery surfaces.

Authors:  Pierre-Henri Cornuault; Luc Carpentier; Marie-Ange Bueno; Jean-Marc Cote; Guy Monteil
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  The neural coding of stimulus intensity: linking the population response of mechanoreceptive afferents with psychophysical behavior.

Authors:  Michael A Muniak; Supratim Ray; Steven S Hsiao; J Frank Dammann; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.