Literature DB >> 2299043

Vibrotactile intensity discrimination measured by three methods.

G A Gescheider1, S J Bolanowski, R T Verrillo, D J Arpajian, T F Ryan.   

Abstract

The difference threshold for the detection of changes in vibration amplitude was measured as a function of the intensity and frequency of stimuli delivered through a 2.9-cm2 contactor to the thenar eminence. Stimuli were either 25- or 250-Hz sinusoids, narrow-band noise centered at 250 Hz, or wideband noise. Thresholds were measured by two-interval, forced-choice tracking under three methods of stimulus presentation. In the gated-pedestal method, subjects had to judge which of two 700-ms bursts of vibration separated by 100 ms was more intense. In the continuous-pedestal method, subjects had to detect a 700-ms increment in the amplitude of an ongoing pedestal of vibration. In the two-burst-continuous-pedestal method with 1500-ms pedestals, the subject had to detect which of two successively presented pedestals contained a 500-ms amplitude increment. Thresholds were consistently lower for detecting increments in the amplitude of a continuous pedestal of vibration than for detecting amplitude differences between briefly presented successive pedestals or amplitude increments in successive pedestals. A "near miss" to Weber's law was found both for sinusoidal and for noise stimuli. The difference threshold was not affected by stimulus frequency condition.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2299043     DOI: 10.1121/1.399300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Power requirements for vibrotactile piezo-electric and electromechanical transducers.

Authors:  C A Perez; A J Santibañez; C A Holzmann; P A Estévez; C M Held
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Ergonomic factors related to drop-off detection with the long cane: effects of cane tips and techniques.

Authors:  Dae Shik Kim; Robert S Wall Emerson; Amy B Curtis
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Vibrotactile amplitude discrimination capacity parallels magnitude changes in somatosensory cortex and follows Weber's Law.

Authors:  E Francisco; V Tannan; Z Zhang; J Holden; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Discrimination of vibrotactile frequencies in a delayed pair comparison task.

Authors:  R J Sinclair; H Burton
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-07

5.  Human discrimination of rotational velocities.

Authors:  Robert M Mallery; Osarenoma U Olomu; Rosalie M Uchanski; Valentin A Militchin; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Vibrotactile masking experiments reveal accelerated somatosensory processing in congenitally blind braille readers.

Authors:  Arindam Bhattacharjee; Amanda J Ye; Joy A Lisak; Maria G Vargas; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Interaction Effects of the Amount of Practice, Preferred Cane Technique, and Type of Cane Technique Used on Drop-off Detection Performance.

Authors:  Dae Shik Kim; Robert Wall Emerson; Amy Curtis
Journal:  J Vis Impair Blind       Date:  2010-08-01

8.  Relationships between touch sensations and estimated population responses of peripheral afferent mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  R H Cohen; C J Vierck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Percept of the duration of a vibrotactile stimulus is altered by changing its amplitude.

Authors:  Eric M Francisco; Jameson K Holden; Richard H Nguyen; Oleg V Favorov; Mark Tommerdahl
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-21

10.  Decoding Accuracy in Supplementary Motor Cortex Correlates with Perceptual Sensitivity to Tactile Roughness.

Authors:  Junsuk Kim; Yoon Gi Chung; Jang-Yeon Park; Soon-Cheol Chung; Christian Wallraven; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Sung-Phil Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.