Literature DB >> 1127614

Stimulus-response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area.

M Knibestöl.   

Abstract

1. Single unit impluses were recorded from the ulnar and median nerves of awake human subjects with tungsten electrodes inserted percutaneously in the upper arm. 2. One hundred and one slowly adapting receptors with receptive fields in the glabrous skin area were studied. The units were classified as type SA-I and type SA-II largely on the basis of their responses to lateral stretching of the skin. Eighty-eight receptors did not respond to this type of stimulus (type SA-I), whereas thirteen receptors readily responded to stretching (type SA-II), AND OFTEN EXHIBITED DIRECTIONAL SENSITIVITY. 3. The SA-I receptors showed no spontaneous discharge, and the discharge pattern was mostly rather irregular, whereas most of the SA-II receptors had a spontaneous discharge, and a very regular discharge pattern. 4. The conduction velocities of the afferent were all in a A alpha range. The mean value for the SA-I receptors was 58-7 plus or minus 2-3m/sec, and for the SA-II receptors 45.3 plus or minus 3.6 m/sec. 5. The neural response to stimuli of varying skin indentation amplitudes was analyzed. The threshold for a dynamic response ranged for the SA-I receptors from 0.15 to 1.35 mm and for the SA-II receptors from 0.25 to 0.95 mm. The threshold for a static discharge ranged for the SA-I receptors from 0.25 to more than 2.0 mm and for the SA-II receptors from 0.55 to 1.65 mm. 6. The stimulus-response functions were analysed for 25 SA-I receptors and 2 SA-II receptors. A hyperbolic log tangent function was the best description when the neural response was defined as the total number of impluses evoked by a stimulus of 1 sec duration. When only the static part of this type of plot was analyzed, a power function was a very good description for many units, but other functions (linear, logarithmic exponential, log tanh) were equally good or better for many units. This was also the dase when the mean impulse frequency of the sustained discharge was defined as a measure of the neural response. These two latter types of plots were clearly negatively accelerating, the exponent of the power function being 0.66 (mean).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1127614      PMCID: PMC1330845          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  19 in total

1.  THE RELATION OF THALAMIC CELL RESPONSE TO PERIPHERAL STIMULI VARIED OVER AN INTENSIVE CONTINUUM.

Authors:  V B MOUNTCASTLE; G F POGGIO; G WERNER
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1963-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  NEURAL ACTIVITY IN MECHANORECEPTIVE CUTANEOUS AFFERENTS: STIMULUS-RESPONSE RELATIONS, WEBER FUNCTIONS, AND INFORMATION TRANSMISSION.

Authors:  G WERNER; V B MOUNTCASTLE
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The pattern of cutaneous innervation of the human hand.

Authors:  M R MILLER; H J RALSTON; M KASAHARA
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1958-03

4.  On intensity characteristics of sensory receptors: a generalized function.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1973-03

5.  The structure and function of a slowly adapting touch corpuscle in hairy skin.

Authors:  A Iggo; A R Muir
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Two classes of slowly adapting mechanoreceptor fibres in reptile cutaneous nerve.

Authors:  B Kenton; L Kruger; M Woo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Functional properties of mechanoreceptors in glabrous skin of the raccoon's forepaw.

Authors:  L M Pubols; B H Pubols; B L Munger
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Cortical progection of the Type I slowly adapting cutaneous afferent units.

Authors:  A Iggo; R L Ramsey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  A quantitative study of cutaneous receptors and afferent fibres in the cat and rabbit.

Authors:  A G Brown; A Iggo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae).

Authors:  K I Naka; W A Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  58 in total

1.  Distribution and behaviour of glabrous cutaneous receptors in the human foot sole.

Authors:  Paul M Kennedy; J Timothy Inglis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents.

Authors:  I Birznieks; P Jenmalm; A W Goodwin; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The detection of human finger movement is not facilitated by input from receptors in adjacent digits.

Authors:  K M Refshauge; D F Collins; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Ankle joint movements are encoded by both cutaneous and muscle afferents in humans.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Aimonetti; Jean-Pierre Roll; Valérie Hospod; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Input-output relation of the somatosensory system for mechanical air-puff stimulation of the index finger in man.

Authors:  I Hashimoto; T Gatayama; K Yoshikawa; M Sasaki; M Nomura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Cutaneous afferents provide a neuronal population vector that encodes the orientation of human ankle movements.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Aimonetti; Valérie Hospod; Jean-Pierre Roll; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Modulation of the trigeminofacial pathway during syllabic speech.

Authors:  Meredith Estep; Steven M Barlow
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface.

Authors:  Gregg A Tabot; John F Dammann; Joshua A Berg; Francesco V Tenore; Jessica L Boback; R Jacob Vogelstein; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The responses of afferent fibres from the glabrous skin of the hand during voluntary finger movements in man.

Authors:  M Hulliger; E Nordh; A E Thelin; A B Vallbo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Statistical analysis and modeling of variance in the SA-I mechanoreceptor response to sustained indentation.

Authors:  Daine R Lesniak; Scott A Wellnitz; Gregory J Gerling; Ellen A Lumpkin
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.