Literature DB >> 6875657

The neural signal for skin indentation depth. I. Changing indentations.

P R Burgess, J Mei, R P Tuckett, K W Horch, C M Ballinger, D A Poulos.   

Abstract

Psychophysical tests on human subjects showed that judgments of skin indentation depth made when the fingertip was indented at rates from 0.2 to 16 mm/sec were quite insensitive to changes in indentation velocity. Similar results were obtained on the forearm at indentation velocities of 0.4 to 16 mm/sec. Recordings were made from mechanoreceptors in the monkey's hand that were able to respond over the same range of velocities and at comparable depths to determine how skin indentation depth might be signaled (coded) at the receptor level and to examine the rate sensitivity of the possible depth codes. It was found that most of the receptors with foci under the stimulator were recruited relatively early during an indentation, especially at velocities of 1.6 mm/sec and higher, making it improbable that the full range of indentation depths is signaled by the "subsurface" recruitment of different receptors at different indentation depths. A subsurface recruitment code involving subcutaneous receptors is not likely since subjects could feel virtually none of the stimuli after skin anesthesia. Progressive recruitment with depth of receptors whose foci lie further and further away from the stimulator ("lateral" recruitment) was considered an unlikely depth code because changing the area of the stimulator had little effect on its perceived depth. Also, it was shown that subjects could sense the curvature of the indentation (the profile of the depth at right angles to the skin surface), which requires information about the depth of individual patches of skin beneath the stimulator. There is no obvious way that a lateral recruitment code can provide this information. Thus it is probable that the discharge rate of some or all of the receptors excited by the indentation is involved in indicating its depth. Both impulse frequency and receptor recruitment at any given depth increased as the velocity of the indentation increased. The demonstrated reliability of information about skin indentation depth in humans indicates that the central neural circuitry responsible for judgments of skin indentation depth is able to compensate for the rate-sensitive receptor signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6875657      PMCID: PMC6564535     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  11 in total

1.  Coding and adaptation during mechanical stimulation in the leech nervous system.

Authors:  G Pinato; V Torre
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Behavioral assessment of sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation of primate somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Thierri Callier; Gregg A Tabot; Robert A Gaunt; Francesco V Tenore; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Tactile discrimination of thickness.

Authors:  K T John; A W Goodwin; I Darian-Smith
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Pursuing prosthetic electronic skin.

Authors:  Alex Chortos; Jia Liu; Zhenan Bao
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 43.841

5.  The neural basis of perceived intensity in natural and artificial touch.

Authors:  Emily L Graczyk; Matthew A Schiefer; Hannes P Saal; Benoit P Delhaye; Sliman J Bensmaia; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  Population estimates for responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors to a vertically indenting probe on the glabrous skin of monkeys.

Authors:  R H Cohen; C J Vierck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Relationships between touch sensations and estimated population responses of peripheral afferent mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  R H Cohen; C J Vierck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Predicting the timing of spikes evoked by tactile stimulation of the hand.

Authors:  Sung Soo Kim; Arun P Sripati; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Discriminability of multiple cutaneous and proprioceptive hand percepts evoked by intraneural stimulation with Utah slanted electrode arrays in human amputees.

Authors:  David M Page; Jacob A George; Suzanne M Wendelken; Tyler S Davis; David T Kluger; Douglas T Hutchinson; Gregory A Clark
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Sequence and organization of barley yellow dwarf virus genomic RNA.

Authors:  W A Miller; P M Waterhouse; W L Gerlach
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-07-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.