Literature DB >> 26269232

Influence of physico-chemical, mechanical and morphological fingerpad properties on the frictional distinction of sticky/slippery surfaces.

Pierre-Henri Cornuault1, Luc Carpentier1, Marie-Ange Bueno2, Jean-Marc Cote1, Guy Monteil1.   

Abstract

This study investigates how the fingerpad hydrolipid film, shape, roughness and rigidity influence the friction when it rubs surfaces situated in the slippery psychophysical dimension. The studied counterparts comprised two 'real' (physical) surfaces and two 'virtual' surfaces. The latter were simulated with a tactile stimulator named STIMTAC. Thirteen women and 13 men rubbed their right forefingers against the different surfaces as their arms were displaced by a DC motor providing constant velocity and sliding distance. Tangential and normal forces were measured with a specific tribometer. The fingerpad hydrolipid film was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The shape and roughness of fingers were extrapolated from replicas. Indentation measurements were carried out to determine fingerpad effective elastic modulus. A clear difference was observed between women and men in terms of friction behaviour. The concept of tactile frictional contrast (TFC) which was introduced quantifies an individual's propensity to distinguish two surfaces frictionally. The lipids/water ratio and water amount on the finger skin significantly influenced the TFC. A correlation was observed between the TFC and fingerpad roughness, i.e. the height of the fingerpad ridges. This is essentially owing to gender differences. A significant difference between men's and women's finger topography was also noted, because our results suggested that men have rougher fingers than women. The friction measurements did not correlate with the fingerpad curvature nor with the epidermal ridges' spatial period.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  biotribology; finger; friction; hydrolipid film; skin; tactile

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26269232      PMCID: PMC4614458          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  25 in total

1.  First spikes in ensembles of human tactile afferents code complex spatial fingertip events.

Authors:  Roland S Johansson; Ingvars Birznieks
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-01-18       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  ROUGHNESS, SMOOTHNESS, AND PREFERENCE: A STUDY OF QUANTITATIVE RELATIONS IN INDIVIDUAL SUBJECTS.

Authors:  G EKMAN; J HOSMAN; B LINDSTROEM
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-07

3.  In vivo biomechanics of the fingerpad skin under local tangential traction.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Vincent Hayward
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Force response of the fingertip pulp to repeated compression--effects of loading rate, loading angle and anthropometry.

Authors:  E R Serina; C D Mote; D Rempel
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Skin surface lipid and skin friction: relation to age, sex and anatomical region.

Authors:  A B Cua; K P Wilhelm; H I Maibach
Journal:  Skin Pharmacol       Date:  1995

6.  Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: a multidimensional scaling analysis.

Authors:  M Hollins; R Faldowski; S Rao; F Young
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-12

7.  Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation.

Authors:  A B Vallbo; R S Johansson
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1984

8.  Is there a gender difference in fingerprint ridge density?

Authors:  M A Acree
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1999-05-31       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 9.  Dissolution of materials in artificial skin surface film liquids.

Authors:  Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Christopher J Harvey
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Relationships between touch sensations and estimated population responses of peripheral afferent mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  R H Cohen; C J Vierck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  12 in total

1.  Fingerpad contact evolution under electrovibration.

Authors:  Omer Sirin; Allan Barrea; Philippe Lefèvre; Jean-Louis Thonnard; Cagatay Basdogan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Contact mechanics of the human finger pad under compressive loads.

Authors:  Brygida M Dzidek; Michael J Adams; James W Andrews; Zhibing Zhang; Simon A Johnson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Influence of different fluid environments on tactile perception and finger friction.

Authors:  Xue Zhou; Marc A Masen; Yi Yuan Li; Kian Kun Yap; Manoj Murali; Zhong Min Jin
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Biophysical properties of the human finger for touch comprehension: influences of ageing and gender.

Authors:  A Abdouni; M Djaghloul; C Thieulin; R Vargiolu; C Pailler-Mattei; H Zahouani
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Mechanisms of tactile sensory deterioration amongst the elderly.

Authors:  Lisa Skedung; Charles El Rawadi; Martin Arvidsson; Céline Farcet; Gustavo S Luengo; Lionel Breton; Mark W Rutland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Impact of finger biophysical properties on touch gestures and tactile perception: Aging and gender effects.

Authors:  A Abdouni; R Vargiolu; H Zahouani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Finger motion and contact by a second finger influence the tactile perception of electrovibration.

Authors:  Yasemin Vardar; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Complexity, rate, and scale in sliding friction dynamics between a finger and textured surface.

Authors:  Behnam Khojasteh; Marco Janko; Yon Visell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Static and active tactile perception and touch anisotropy: aging and gender effect.

Authors:  A Abdouni; G Moreau; R Vargiolu; H Zahouani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Survival of polymeric microstructures subjected to interrogatory touch.

Authors:  Mickey Finn; Jeremy Treiber; Mahmoud Issa; Christian J Martens; Colin P Feeney; Lehna Ngwa; Charles Dhong; Darren J Lipomi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.