Literature DB >> 18420286

Tactile intensity and population codes.

Sliman J Bensmaia1.   

Abstract

An important question in neuroscience is how different aspects of a stimulus are encoded at different stages of neural processing. In this review, I discuss studies investigating the peripheral neural code for perceived intensity in touch. One of the recurrent themes in this line of research is that information about stimulus intensity is encoded in the activity of populations of neurons. Not only is information integrated across afferents of a given type, but information is also combined across submodalities to yield a unified percept of stimulus intensity. The convergence of information stemming from multiple submodalities is particularly interesting in light of the fact that these are generally thought to be parallel sensory channels with distinct sensory functions and little cross-channel interactions. I discuss implications of a recently proposed model of intensity coding for psychophysical functions and for the coding of intensity in cortex. I also briefly review the peripheral coding of intensity in other sensory modalities.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18420286      PMCID: PMC2659538          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  54 in total

1.  Periodicity and firing rate as candidate neural codes for the frequency of vibrotactile stimuli.

Authors:  E Salinas; A Hernandez; A Zainos; R Romo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  K O Johnson
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Neural coding mechanisms underlying perceived roughness of finely textured surfaces.

Authors:  T Yoshioka; B Gibb; A K Dorsch; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Complex tactile waveform discrimination.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; M Hollins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Summation of vibrotactile intensity: an analog to auditory critical bands?

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1979-06

6.  Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: the relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness.

Authors:  D T Blake; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The effects of masking on the growth of vibrotactile sensation magnitude and on the amplitude difference limen: a test of the equal sensation magnitude-equal difference limen hypothesis.

Authors:  G A Gescheider; S J Bolanowski; J J Zwislocki; K L Hall; C Mascia
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey.

Authors:  A W Freeman; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innervating glabrous skin of the monkey.

Authors:  K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Detection thresholds for stimuli in humans and monkeys: comparison with threshold events in mechanoreceptive afferent nerve fibers innervating the monkey hand.

Authors:  V B Mountcastle; R H LaMotte; G Carli
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  21 in total

1.  Tactile localization depends on stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Peter Steenbergen; Jan R Buitenweg; Jörg Trojan; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The neural basis of perceived intensity in natural and artificial touch.

Authors:  Emily L Graczyk; Matthew A Schiefer; Hannes P Saal; Benoit P Delhaye; Sliman J Bensmaia; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Electrocorticographic changes in field potentials following natural somatosensory percepts in humans.

Authors:  Daniel R Kramer; Michael F Barbaro; Morgan Lee; Terrance Peng; George Nune; Charles Y Liu; Spencer Kellis; Brian Lee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Temporal coding of intensity of NaCl and HCl in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the rat.

Authors:  Jen-Yung Chen; Jonathan D Victor; Patricia M Di Lorenzo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Small-molecule inhibition of STOML3 oligomerization reverses pathological mechanical hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Christiane Wetzel; Simone Pifferi; Cristina Picci; Caglar Gök; Diana Hoffmann; Kiran K Bali; André Lampe; Liudmila Lapatsina; Raluca Fleischer; Ewan St John Smith; Valérie Bégay; Mirko Moroni; Luc Estebanez; Johannes Kühnemund; Jan Walcher; Edgar Specker; Martin Neuenschwander; Jens Peter von Kries; Volker Haucke; Rohini Kuner; James F A Poulet; Jan Schmoranzer; Kate Poole; Gary R Lewin
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors within fingerpad to stimulus information for tactile softness sensation of materials.

Authors:  Jiyong Hu; Qun Zhao; Ruitao Jiang; Rubin Wang; Xin Ding
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Deep continuous theta burst stimulation of the operculo-insular cortex selectively affects Aδ-fibre heat pain.

Authors:  Cédric Lenoir; Maxime Algoet; André Mouraux
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Peripheral and central changes combine to induce motor behavioral deficits in a moderate repetition task.

Authors:  Jacques-Olivier Coq; Ann E Barr; Fabrizio Strata; Michael Russier; David M Kietrys; Michael M Merzenich; Nancy N Byl; Mary F Barbe
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  Anodal Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) Selectively Inhibits the Synaptic Efficacy of Nociceptive Transmission at Spinal Cord Level.

Authors:  Cédric Lenoir; Aleksandar Jankovski; André Mouraux
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Multiplexed Population Coding of Stimulus Properties by Leech Mechanosensory Cells.

Authors:  Friederice Pirschel; Jutta Kretzberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.