Literature DB >> 8333299

Reoperation after lumbar disc surgery: results in 130 cases.

J Fandiño1, C Botana, A Viladrich, J Gomez-Bueno.   

Abstract

Out of a series of 1850 cases operated upon for lumbar disc herniation 130 underwent re-operation because of persistent or recurrent symptoms. Re-operation was successful in 62%. The prognosis of re-operation was not related to special clinical symptoms and signs but only to the operative findings. Herniations at other levels and recurrences of lumbar disc herniations had the best results (excellent in 98% respectively 54%), but scar formations alone came out much less satisfactory (only 38% excellent results). Computed tomography (CT) findings were less reliable in distinguishing between disc prolapse and fibrosis than magnet resonance imaging (MR). Therefore MR is the diagnostic method of choice in these conditions, and scar formations alone should be considered a contra-indication for re-operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8333299     DOI: 10.1007/bf01446994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  20 in total

1.  A study of the causes of failure in the herniated intervertebral disc operation; an analysis of sixty-seven reoperated cases.

Authors:  J GREENWOOD; T H McGUIRE; F KIMBELL
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1952-01       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Microlumbar discectomy.

Authors:  J C Maroon; A A Abla
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1986

3.  Results of microsurgical lumbar discectomy. Review on 485 patients.

Authors:  U Ebeling; W Reichenberg; H J Reulen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Microsurgical lumbar discectomy: preliminary report of 83 consecutive cases.

Authors:  D H Wilson; J Kenning
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Recurrent postoperative sciatica: evaluation with MR imaging and enhanced CT.

Authors:  L Frocrain; R Duvauferrier; J L Husson; J Noël; A Ramée; Y Pawlotsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Microlumbar discectomy: follow-up of 477 patients.

Authors:  H J Goald
Journal:  J Microsurg       Date:  1980-12

7.  Surgery for intervertebral disk disease of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  L L Wiltse
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Results of surgical intervention in the symptomatic multiply-operated back patient. Analysis of sixty-seven cases followed for three to seven years.

Authors:  W J Finnegan; J M Fenlin; J P Marvel; R J Nardini; R H Rothman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Long-term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy.

Authors:  P J Lewis; B K Weir; R W Broad; M G Grace
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Results of operative treatment of lumbar disc herniation. A survey of 886 patients.

Authors:  P Salenius; L E Laurent
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1977
View more
  22 in total

1.  [Recurrent disc herniation during chronic pain therapy].

Authors:  M Lorenz
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Zhiming Chen; Jie Zhao; Aigang Liu; Jiandong Yuan; Zhonghai Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Long-term outcomes of the revision open lumbar discectomy by fenestration: A follow-up study of more than 10 years.

Authors:  Jiong Jiong Guo; Huilin Yang; Tiansi Tang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Reoperation after lumbar disc surgery in two hundred and seven patients.

Authors:  Jiwei Cheng; Hongwei Wang; Wenjie Zheng; Changqing Li; Jian Wang; Zhengfeng Zhang; Bo Huang; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: Results of Revision Surgery and Assessment of Factors that May Affect the Outcome. A Non-Concurrent Prospective Study.

Authors:  Mohammed Ibrahim; Justin Arockiaraj; Rohit Amritanand; Krishnan Venkatesh; Kenny Samuel David
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

6.  Microsurgical extraforaminal decompression of lumbar root canal stenosis.

Authors:  L Papavero; R Kothe
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Revision surgery for lumbar disc herniation. An analysis of 45 patients.

Authors:  H Baba; Q Chen; K Kamitani; S Imura; K Tomita
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Treatment of Recurrent Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Doniel Drazin; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Lutfi Al-Khouja; Dongyan Yang; Patrick Johnson; Terrence Kim; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-05-23

9.  The effectiveness of non-surgical treatments, re-discectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in post-discectomy pain syndrome.

Authors:  Mehmet Nuri Erdem; Halil Yener Erken; Mehmet Aydogan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

10.  Open Discectomy vs. Microdiscectomy: Results from 519 Patients Operated for Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Cagatay Calikoglu; Murteza Cakir
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.